Why the facination with integrated amps?


I don’t get it. Is it the manufacturers spotting a trend with the tail wagging the dog or does a significant market segment truly prefer the idea of an integrated?
Pros;
Less space
One less set of IC’s
In theory-one less chassis/case to pay for
Shorter signal paths possible
Can combine transformer/cap function
Cons;
Power supply interference/spuriae
Reduced Flexibility-can’t switch amp or preamp as easily or go to monoblocs
Less resonance control
Long history of lesser performance per measurements and long-term subjective listening
Less resale value if it turns out to be a fad
Less liklihood of an extremely high performing active preamp

I freely admit I am a skeptic. The industry-like so many others-looks for new market niches to move product. 
FWIW, the only integrateds I myself would care to audition would be from Esoteric and Luxman who have a long history of designing no-compromise (low-compromise) high-end integrateds. 

128x128fsonicsmith
That's all well and good but at what cost?   In the real world with mortgage payments, college tuition, and the ever increasing cost of living many people have to find a middle ground of sorts and compromise somewhere
Right. Including me, at least for now. Economic future is getting more and more uncertain for the majority, I think. I currently spend less on equipment upgrades than I could.
That’s one reason why I am interested in Gryphon Diablo 300 and consider getting it at some point in time, most likely used. It is very close to no-compromise integrated, of course it’s a compromise compared to Gryphon separates. If it lasts me for ten years, even new this would not be too much. Problem is that you have to pay upfront or finance on not so favorable terms. But eventually I think I’ll get it, unless I decide to go all tubes or get very lucky with older Gryphon separates.
Audiotroy - 

My system configuration is:

·       T+A PV3000HV Integrated

·       T+A MP3000HV Multi Source Player

·       Bryston BDP-3 Digital Music Player w/ Samsung 860 PRO 2TB 2.5 Inch SATA III Internal SSD

·       Music Hall MMF-9.1 Turntable (with the Goldring Eroica LX cartridge)

·       Legacy Audio Focus SE Loudspeakers (bi-wired)

I have two short (20’) dedicated 30 amp 10 gauge service lines (US made Southwire Romex - 😊) from the panel for this system. The integrated amp is plugged directly into the wall and the other components going to a Furman PST-8D Digital Power Station, the MP3000HV two powers cables - one for the digital side and one for the analog side, I spit between each of the PST-8D isolated banks.

Surge protection:

·       Leviton 20/240-Volt 200 Amp Outdoor Rated Meter Socket Surge Arrester

·       Eaton CHSPT2ULTRA Breaker box surge protection

I am pretty light vinyl user so I went a bit middle of the road with a turntable. The BDP-3 is connected to the MP3000HV via AES/EBU – I think sound quality is a bit better than going USB.


AES/EBU better than USB?  Really?  AES/EBU is just SPDIF on a balanced physical layer, with all the synchronous issues (clock is least common denominator) rather than USB whcih allows, no, demands re-clocking - its asynchronous. Actually its not re-clocking, its clocking, period. That means your DAC determines the timing, and timing + voltage (DAC'd output) = slope = frequency = music, to over-simplify.  So that's almost astonishing, unless your digital source has God;s own clock.
You hear what you hear, and you may be right in this instance, but i'd be asking myself "why?" and "what's wrong with the other interface?"
G