Thanks for all that illuminating insight Tom!
I no longer have the 3.7s, but when I did, as I've written before, my comparisons suggested the 3.7s were the somewhat more accomplished speaker in terms of over all perfection, no doubt due to Jim's oversight. Still, I was amazed how close in sound the 2.7s were with the 3.7s. Definitely the same overall voice. Though, to my ears, the 2.7s seemed voiced a tad "sweeter" with a bit of a comfortable depression somewhere in the upper mids/lower highs. Subtle, but there, I think.