So we all (kinda) agree that cables have an impact on sound quality...we all want to hear the ‘pure, unaltered sound’ coming out of our speakers... how about the cables that were used during the recording session? I doubt all those record studios use ‘high end’ cables...
Many studios do use 'high-end' cables. I wired many with Mogami, Canare, Belden, Monster, etc. Some spent as much on cable as the mixing desk.
However, those same studios all have a different sound due to room, electronics and microphones. We often drove across town to record in a specific space for its sonics. The Complex, Sunset, Record Plant, Oceanway, Capital 'A', Village, or cross country to Hit Factory, Sony, or offshore to Monserrat, Abbey Road, etc. So when you get a piece recorded in multiple rooms, whose cable would you use? Change cable per disc? Track? Chorus?
Add in EQ & compression by the earless A&R department in yet another facility.
Add in sonic changes from watermarking, disc stamping, etc.
Add in sonic thumbprints for player, pre, amplifier.
Add in sonic
bootprint for speakers.
It's a wonder it's listenable at all.
I just roll my eyes when I read equipment reviews where the kazoo on this or the conga on that or the calliope on the next had some particular authority. All that has happened is the endless series of colorations has aligned to what the reviewer thinks something sounds like. BUNK!
>>> NO PLAYBACK SYSTEM ANYWHERE EVER SOUNDED LIVE <<<
@prof +1 - keep on firing.