The Science of Cables
When aftermarket cable makers measure, that's not good enough, huh? David Salz at WireWorld, Grant at Shunyata... No good, eh? When Mogami measures, that's good enough. Hyprocrites. Imo, you're cheapskates. Your wallet rules your decisions. You don't compare because you can't stomach the idea of spending anything on it. Defense of Pro cables is to guard your money. You love them because their cheap, and you bought the marketing. LOTUS POSITION, EVERYONE! Do you guys sit with your legs crossed to get the most out of your Mogami cables? ;) Chintzy. That's closer to the truth. I know, I used to be a cable skeptic. :) So, who among our skeptics wishes to try Schroeder Method of Interconnect Placement? |
I'm sure that at this point our cable skeptics are really appreciating the gross generalizations I have made. i.e. cable skeptics are chintzy. It's not so different than gross generalizations characterizing persons who use (even expensive) aftermarket cables with negative religious allusions or calling them unscientific. Perhaps a bit of mirror gazing would be helpful for our skeptics. |
When aftermarket cable makers measure, that's not good enough, huh? David Salz at WireWorld, Grant at Shunyata... No good, eh? When Mogami measures, that's good enough. "Fools", said I, "You do not know Silence like a cancer grows Hear my words that I might teach you Take my arms that I might reach you" But my words, like silent raindrops fell And echoed in the wells of silence All the best, Nonoise |
Canare is obviously more scientific than Mogami. All you who bought Mogami aren't very scientific. Canare has better charts, and even a DF chart. Much more scientific. Absolutely proves Canare sounds better. As we all know, a DF chart demonstrates how a cable sounds in an absolute fashion such that no consideration of the rest of the system is necessary. Mogami users were duped by the anti-scientific marketing. Better buy Canare to be assured of better sound. |
