An Excellent New Read: "A Brief History Of Why Artists Are No Longer Making A Living..."


Posted March 14th, 2019 by Ian Tamblyn. "A Brief History Of Why Artists Are No Longer Making A Living Making Music".

https://www.rootsmusic.ca/2019/03/14/a-brief-history-of-why-artists-are-no-longer-making-a-living-ma...


128x128ivan_nosnibor

In the old days, touring was considered part of record promotion. The record companies paid for all expenses incurred, which were deducted off the top of the gross from album sales, the artist/band receiving no royalty checks until the debt had been repaid. Those expenses involved not just the tour bus, hotels, food, drugs (yes, in some cases they were provided for hard-partying bands), etc., but also all advertising and promotion for the shows. Artists/bands also paid for all the advertising done for their record, including any payola. Oh yeah, they also paid for all the recording costs, as well as record production---LP, tape, and CD. All of that was also taken off the top. The album producer is paid off the gross profit, not the net like the artist/band. That’s why Last Waltz "producer" Robbie Robertson made a fortune off the movie and album, the other four members of The Band not a dime.

Touring was always done at a loss---it cost more to tour than the amount of money ticket sales brought in. All the money an artist/band made were off record sales (and for songwriters from radio play, as miniscule as that income was). Now that album sales generate little or no income (unless you sell a LOT of them), artists/bands go on the road to eat and pay rent. Ticket prices reflect that reality! A ticket to see any show at The Fillmore, The Carousel Ballroom, or Winterland (all in San Francisco) in the late-60’s/early-70’s cost me $3.00/$3.50 (but the weed was free ;-). Hendrix, Cream, Jeff Beck, The Kinks, Elton John, Albert King, the doors, Quicksilver, Big Brother, you name it, $3.00/$3.50. No one sold merchandise at shows back then, whereas now a band may make as much (or more) from sales of merchandise as from ticket sales.

But musicians working for peanuts is nothing new. When Commander Cody had a big hit on the radio ("Hot Rod Lincoln"), his guitarist, the great Telecaster player Bill Kirchen, complained in an interview that he was making less than a Berkeley (where the band was based) garbage man. Longtime Wings drummer Denny Seiwell has said McCartney was paying him $150/wk in the early 70’s. When McCartney’s current drummer, the phenomenal Art Laboriel, Jr., is off the road, he is teaching (giving music lessons). Musicians are like priests, they take a vow of poverty. Here’s a deep, dark, not-very-well-kept secret: many musicians (even pretty successful ones) rely on their girlfriend or wife for support.

Here’s a story told by a band member whose name (and band) I have forgotten. That he and they were very well known I DO remember. The band was in the middle of recording their next album, and a record company executive visited the studio to see how things were going. The band took a break, and the executive said "Hey, let me bring in some pizzas for ya’ll". They finished the album, it was released, and when their first quarter accounting statement came in, they saw the executive had charged the pizzas to the band! One thing I liked about the early Rappers was than when they came into a meeting with record company execs, they would sit down and put their piece on the table, telling the execs that if any of them scr*wed with them (the artist), there would be dire consequences.

@ivan_nosnibor the people that often rail against the system most are other lawyers! No slight read into your post. I teach now part time, I’m retired, and the challenge is helping young earnest people who are smart find a path that is meaningful and can pay the bills-- not unlike our artist friends. Well, that’s a stretch, but it’s a similar big universe of a talent pool with a small number of slots for people in the go-to firms to reach partnership level- and that business has changed too. My first question to any young person who is considering law school is to ask what they are passionate about. I’ve met many interesting people during my career and that was, in retrospect, probably one of the rewards for the hard work, hours and stress.

@orpheus10  and @whart 

Much thanks for the kind words.

@whoopycat

"...he treats WWII as the beginning of time." I think that's just because that marks for him the beginning of his point of involvement with the industry and he was perhaps reluctant to try to account for any of the period prior to that since it would plainly involve speculation. I think I can sympathize with that. But, your point about touring remains well taken. Thanks for your post.

@bdp24 

Thanks for your post. Very interesting anecdotes!

'three easy payments' offered...
and Elvis didn't place an emphasis on looks and theatrics and sexuality instead of quality music? Did he not rip off black people's music for the most part and monetize their craft at a level they could never have dreamed of? I think we are being a bit too simplistic here. It's never been easy separating form from function. Things are no different today than they ever have been. You think it's ever been easy making money from music????
The poster has no problem regurgitating a half-baked 1980's music rag notion that cannot be supported by fact surrounding Elvis Presley and this ridiculous buzz word, 'culture theft'.
Elvis Presley was the conduit and crossroads of American music before an industry grew large enough to manufacture such a thing. Because he also happened to be genetically 'beautiful', half-wits throughout the years tended to discount his mind boggling talents and allure, which are still, arguably, unmatched.
If what the best selling artist of all time did was able to be replicated as a formula, or for that matter, equaled, it would have been done over sixty years ago.
He had no equals, black or white and could only be eclipsed by The Beatles, a worthy and equally unmatchable phenomenon.
To mention very few off the top of my head- Robert Plant, Jackie Wilson, Springsteen, James Brown and Lennon himself would agree, so if self-hating post 1970's white kids with lowered testosterone levels, no war to protest, a dismal array of genuine generational rock & roll heroes and their little word processors, think so, they're in shallow waters. There was no equal. Not in his time or since.
I agree that "cultural appropriation" or "cultural theft" are ridiculous concepts.