Here again Cleeds you are referring to my statement and my statement alone; no one else stated any thing that would incite you to make the statement;
"That’s not to say that you might not prefer a copy of the original, but it can’t contain musical information not present on the master."
While you are referring to the statement I made that the playback sounded better than the LP when recorded at 15 IPS, I did not say that there was information which was not on the LP.
It's all about the highest degree of definition; there was information on the LP which was transferred to the tape, that was not profoundly amplified by the LP playback. That's a day and night difference from information not present.