referencing vs plug & play


This last couple of months more of you have been getting ahold of me, it's cool don't stop. I enjoy working on your systems and especially enjoy some listening together. Something though is coming up often and it's making me wonder if somewhere along the way someone has dropped the ball when it comes to comparing components. In talking with a few of you I've learned that a lot of you are dropping components into your systems and comparing without dialing your system into the new set of conditions. Back in the early days of referencing, before plug & play, when we made changes to a system we treated the system as if everything was starting from scratch. We knew that if making a component swap took place that we were going to need to make the rest of the audio chain suitable to accommodate the new signal path. "make a change anywhere in the flow and you've made a new flow"

When the plug & play audio clubs started popping up my friends looked at me as if these folks were off their rockers. I just figured they were doing something interesting but weren't really serious about club night, more than a chance to mingle. It's kind of the same thought as a trade show. You don't really take them serious, but it gives a chance to meet and greet. Saying this, I'm starting to think possibly I was wrong and plug & play has become the norm over actually referencing systems. My mind tells me this is nuts, right, but I'm hearing more and more that HEA folks are actually simply dropping components in mid chain and that's it. So I have to ask.

You do realize plug & play is different from referencing a system change don't you?

please be respectful to each other, thanks

Michael Green

128x128michaelgreenaudio
I am with geoffkait on...

"Unloosening the wall outlet screws is an excellent idea."
Tighter does seem like a wiser idea. Less dust in there will affect the sound less, I suppose. So, tighter they should be.

I wouldn't say our hearing is a fairly limited sense. 
"The problems of deafness are deeper and more complex, if not more important, than those of blindness. Deafness is a much worse misfortune. For it means the loss of the most vital stimulus--the sound of the voice that brings language, sets thoughts astir and keeps us in the intellectual company of man.
"…after a lifetime in silence and darkness that to be deaf is a greater affliction than to be blind... Hearing is the soul of knowledge and information of a high order. To be cut off from hearing is to be isolated indeed."
Blindness cuts you off from things. But deafness cuts you off from people.

---Helen Keller 

Also, our visual cortex uses our ears to predict what our eyes are about to see. See this:https://www.medicaldaily.com/our-ears-help-us-see-whats-coming-our-eyes-thanks-visual-cortex-284624

All the best,

Nonoise

Hi Elizabeth

I just wrote you a manual on screw adjusting and then my computer rebooted. LOL isn't that the way it goes. Maybe I will get a chance to do it again tomorrow. Also when you get into this a little, consider starting a thread on TuneLand. Some of this is easier to do when we use pictures, drawings and words. Plus on TuneLand you will have others Tuning with you "referencing". Or yet another option is I can do a thread there and link to it if I do an illustration.

MG

Amplifiers are just one proof our hearing is quite limited.

Sure, hearing is important and all that, but once we start hearing leaves falling, we may be overestimating ourselves.