The Harbeth phenomenon


In my search for a new pair of speakers, I've gone through many threads here and noticed that many owners or fans of Harbeth have almost a love-like connection with Harbeth speakers. It is almost as if the speakers cast a spell upon them. I know many audiophiles love their speakers but Harbeth owners seem especially enamored with theirs. I am extremely puzzled by this phenomenon because on paper Harbeth speakers look average at best and lack many of the attributes that generally make a great speaker.

Their sensitivity of generally around the 86dB mark makes them rather inefficient and therefore, at least in theory, not a good match for many lower powered tube amps, or any amps below 100wpc. Their frequency range is simply inferior to most high-end speakers since they don't go below 40 Hz. This alone should, again at least in theory, disqualify Harbeth speakers from consideration as top high end speakers. And yet I've never heard anyone complain about their bass, while people complain about lack of bass in the Gibbon Nines from DeVore, which is a fantastic speaker. Their cabinets look like a cheap DIY enclosure (disclaimer: I've never seen a Harbeth up close, only pictures). The 7ES-3 is rated B-Restricted, while the smaller and cheaper Usher Be-718 A-Restricted in Stereophile but garners nowhere near the same amount of admiration, praise and following among audiophiles.

So what's going on here? Is this a big conspiracy plot by the company that paid off a few hundred of people to infiltrate audiophile internet forums and a few reviewers? I am of course joking here, but the question is serious. How can speakers so average on paper be so good in real life? I know the opposite is often true, but you rarely see this phenomenon.

Please speak up.
actusreus
If you can’t energize a room with lifelike sound levels and maintain low distortion/low compression then a table top radio will do!
Our local music club met at one of our member's homes last night and we listened to his Harbeths.  We started off with the p3esr and spent most of the evening listening to the Super HL5plus which were supplemented by high end JL Audio and Rel subs (I don't remember which models).  It was one of the best sounding systems I've heard and I can see why people fall in love with them.
In one post dave_b stated "There are many paths to satisfaction, various priorities and expectations." And in another he states " If you can’t energize a room with lifelike sound levels and maintain low distortion/low compression then a table top radio will do!"Surely there are many "paths to satisfaction" between the two extremes.

Sorry Valinar...forgot the IMHO!!  Did not mean to cast that net over anyone else.  I did go to my dealer to listen to the H40.1’s.  They are very good, smooth and clear with great tone (Macintosh gear).  My original thoughts were still validated however.  They just dont allow enough energy to come through, especially at higher volume levels.  Perhaps another room, diffèrent cables or electronics?
No problem at all dave_b. As a past owner of Compact 7es3 and m30.1, and presently own SHL 5+ 40th anniversary and P3esr 40th anniversary I tend to agree with your characterization of them at higher volumes (although contrary to Alan Shaw’s advice I use an integrated amp rated at 70 W/8ohm).
My wife and are season ticket holders to the Illinois Symphony Orchestra and I sometimes slip into musing about recreating the dynamics and scale of the music  at home while listening live at the hall. I know better. However I find daily delight listening at home in the living room to the SHL 5s driven by my LFD NCSE MK2+, rarely past 80db.
Cheers