The JC Whitney syndrome


Those of you that have tinkered with cars as a hobby probably remember the JC Whitney catalogue. This was a mail order catalogue that offered various performance upgrades that could be installed on your car. What always amused me were the claims made by each product. There were literally hundreds of add on products, each claiming to "increase HP by x amount" and/or "improve gas mileage by y MPG". I used to joke that if you installed all the accessories being offered, you would be able to add thousands of horsepower while getting over 100 MPG.  This is not to say that each product taken on its own wouldn't have some merit, but the improvements are not necessarily cumulative.

Same goes for audio. Every product (I'm referring mainly to "tweeks" here) claims to offer "tighter and more extended base, clearer highs, better transparency, freedom from coloration, less listening fatigue, greater detail, etc., etc. The benefits (real or imagined) of audiophile wall sockets, power conditioners and chords, cables, vibration pods and spikes, equipment racks, cable supporters, binding posts and terminations made of unobtainium, etc. etc. are typically not cumulative. While any of the aforementioned items may provide a sonic benefit on its own, that benefit may be lost or diminished by the addition of additional tweeks. In such cases, 1 + 1 often equals something less than 2. Your system may have reached a point where the addition of a normally beneficial tweak provides no audible benefit at all. 

Don't fall victim to the JC Whitney syndrome.

J.Chip
jchiappinelli
jchiappinelli

I'm not telling anyone how to improve their system. Just suggesting that any improvements added are not necessarily 100% cumulative. We can agree to disagree.

BTW, this whole forum exits where strangers make suggestions and voice opinions on how to improve another person's system, most of which are purely subjective.

Not telling anyone how to improve their system, no. What you're doing is much worse. You just insulted experienced tweakers, implying we're as dumb as the people buying the JC Whitney catalog crap. 

And yeah a lot of this is subjective, and there are a lot of opinions. We all have to judge which have merit. On that score, way down at the bottom of the heap, are unfounded opinions based on zero personal experience that run counter to what we know to be true.

But hey, feel free to keep em coming! What we're here for... according to you, anyway.

FWIW, OP I get what your point is, I also get that you were not disputing the worthiness of tweaks.
For all the tweakers, Jeez, give the guy a break. This is a forum after all and no one should be ridiculed for posting their thoughts.
Run it up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes. Not everyone may salute. 😁
In the 70’s I bought some parts for my Camaro from JC Whitney. While waiting for the order they went bankrupt. They were back in business 6 months later and of course kept my money. The catalog still says in business since 1915.
Jeez, I cant believe how sensitive and insecure some of the responses have been.

1) I haven't made any personal attacks on anyone
2) I'm not disputing the worthiness of some tweeks (thank you gillatgh)
3) It was certainly not my intention to insult "experienced tweekers. I'm a tweeker myself. Just expressing an opinion regarding the effectiveness of adding additional tweeks to an already heavily tweaked system.
4) never implied tweekers were dumb, nor that those who have purchased aftermarket items from JC Whitney were dumb.

I appreciate the honest feedback from those who have expressed their differing opinions without resorting to ridicule simply because they disagree.

J.Chip