Acoustic treatment

I’m a big fan of tiny little bowl acoustic resonators as opposed to big ugly Tube Traps or mattress size panels. They’re much easier to set up, too. As it turns out corners aren’t even the right place for Tube Traps half the time.

+1 millercarbon

     Bass tube traps, imho, are big, expensive, ugly as sin and are completely unnecessary if you invest in this instead:

https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/audiokinesis-swarm-subwoofer-system/

     This distributed bass array system will provide sota bass response in any room and seamlessly integrate with any pair of main speakers.  It'll also look a helluva better in your room than bass traps.
     I've been using this with large Magnepan panels for the last 4 yrs and can verify the review is very accurate.

Tim

It is easy to Dampen frequencies 250 Hz and up. Doing so creatively can make a big improvement in imaging. Unfortunately as you go further down especially as the wavelengths get longer than 100 Hz it becomes progressively harder. I have played with tube traps in two installations with severe comb filtering and irregardless of anything I did with the traps could not get the variation below 10 db. This is walking around using a volume meter and tone generator. In both instances I told the customer that he needed a new room. Back then we did not have room control. Using a good room followed by careful positioning of the speakers and the listening position and damping primary reflections with the goal of improving imaging is the best way to deal with the problem of bass in an enclosed room. Some speakers and sub woofers are significantly easier in this regard. I have never seen tube traps work and my own opinion from my admittedly limited experience is that they are a waste of money. 

Oh and Mr Rocket science. How big would a helmholtz resonator have to be to resonate at 20 Hz? Anyone care to guess?