Ok guys,
i played mainly redbook files and I played with the filters on the dcs and settled on filter 5 which is what the manual recommends.
Here are my main impressions in my system based on the set ups described above:
DCS Vivaldi:
PROS:
- outstanding bass with tight, clean, punchy notes throughout all music played
-Clear mids with an incredible level of articulation.
- highs are clean and crisp with no edginess of any kind regardless of the content
- MQA is insane. I’m now an mqa believer because of this machine.
- amazing instrument separation
- the best solid state dac I’ve had here
CONS:
- soundstage is big but not the tallest
- lacks the 3d dimensionality of some of the best gear I’ve had here
-lacks the emotion of tube equipment
-although it has accuracy in spades, it can also rob you at times from connecting to with the music
- Short decays
Lampizator Pacific (KR 242 tubes)
PROS:
-Huge soundstage that is both, wide and tall
- deep presentation where you can hear words echo in deeper layers
- world class highs with outstanding decay
- midrange is excellent as expected from a tube
- insane amounts of emotion and feeling with the music you play through it
- the best 3d sound I’ve ever heard through my Neoliths (Rowland & lampizator)
CONS:
- bass control could be tighter, deeper
- Tubes aren’t cheap so there is a cost of ownership which is not the case with the DCS
- Long listening sessions end up being until 2 am which makes you sleepy the following day.
With that said, please remember I’m doing an instant A/B comparison. I’m not comparing things using my memory. This is being done RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW. A few things that jump at me through the DCS is instrument separation and bass. They are so amazing and incredible and yes they do beat the lampizator’s own BUT I prefer the massive, musical and engaging presentation of the lampizator. I realize you can’t have it all with a component so I choose the musical & emotional presentation of the lampizator over the accuracy of the DCS.
Of course, if the DCS was indeed the full system then I expect it to beat the lampizator but I’m trying to do an apples to apples here. Dac vs Dac.
I also could have used the expensive powercord on the lampizator but I decided to use the cheaper wireworld silver 7 instead and the Odin 1 on tbe DCS and I still choose the lampizator over the DCS based on my own preference.
I also wanted to say that the Virgo preamp DOES help the DCS become more romantic sounding with more 3D sound. If I were to keep the DCS, I’d have to keep the Virgo 3 preamp.
i played mainly redbook files and I played with the filters on the dcs and settled on filter 5 which is what the manual recommends.
Here are my main impressions in my system based on the set ups described above:
DCS Vivaldi:
PROS:
- outstanding bass with tight, clean, punchy notes throughout all music played
-Clear mids with an incredible level of articulation.
- highs are clean and crisp with no edginess of any kind regardless of the content
- MQA is insane. I’m now an mqa believer because of this machine.
- amazing instrument separation
- the best solid state dac I’ve had here
CONS:
- soundstage is big but not the tallest
- lacks the 3d dimensionality of some of the best gear I’ve had here
-lacks the emotion of tube equipment
-although it has accuracy in spades, it can also rob you at times from connecting to with the music
- Short decays
Lampizator Pacific (KR 242 tubes)
PROS:
-Huge soundstage that is both, wide and tall
- deep presentation where you can hear words echo in deeper layers
- world class highs with outstanding decay
- midrange is excellent as expected from a tube
- insane amounts of emotion and feeling with the music you play through it
- the best 3d sound I’ve ever heard through my Neoliths (Rowland & lampizator)
CONS:
- bass control could be tighter, deeper
- Tubes aren’t cheap so there is a cost of ownership which is not the case with the DCS
- Long listening sessions end up being until 2 am which makes you sleepy the following day.
With that said, please remember I’m doing an instant A/B comparison. I’m not comparing things using my memory. This is being done RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW. A few things that jump at me through the DCS is instrument separation and bass. They are so amazing and incredible and yes they do beat the lampizator’s own BUT I prefer the massive, musical and engaging presentation of the lampizator. I realize you can’t have it all with a component so I choose the musical & emotional presentation of the lampizator over the accuracy of the DCS.
Of course, if the DCS was indeed the full system then I expect it to beat the lampizator but I’m trying to do an apples to apples here. Dac vs Dac.
I also could have used the expensive powercord on the lampizator but I decided to use the cheaper wireworld silver 7 instead and the Odin 1 on tbe DCS and I still choose the lampizator over the DCS based on my own preference.
I also wanted to say that the Virgo preamp DOES help the DCS become more romantic sounding with more 3D sound. If I were to keep the DCS, I’d have to keep the Virgo 3 preamp.