The Science of Cables


It seems to me that there is too little scientific, objective evidence for why cables sound the way they do. When I see discussions on cables, physical attributes are discussed; things like shielding, gauge, material, geometry, etc. and rarely are things like resistance, impedance, inductance, capacitance, etc. Why is this? Why aren’t cables discussed in terms of physical measurements very often?

Seems to me like that would increase the customer base. I know several “objectivist” that won’t accept any of your claims unless you have measurements and blind tests. If there were measurements that correlated to what you hear, I think more people would be interested in cables. 

I know cables are often system dependent but there are still many generalizations that can be made.
128x128mkgus
I could go on and ask which ones for decades now have been seen as gullible idiots waiting to be parted from their money? 

Join the dots if you need, scratch your heads if it helps...but love, desire and passion can be dangerous impulses which all too easily can lead to an obsession.. which eventually turns out to be an expensive mirage.
The Rime of the Ancient Audiophile (excerpt)

'God save thee, ancient audiophile!
From the fiends, that plague thee thus!—

Why look'st thou so?'—With my credit card

I bought  the OVERPRICED CABLE.


https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43997/the-rime-of-the-ancient-mariner-text-of-1834

Post removed 
"Directionality, cryogenics, burn in."
Do cryogenics and burn-in neutralize each other?