Where are the subs?


In listening to the Bach Toccata and Fugue BMV 565, I was struck by how well the organ pedal notes are reproduced since I moved my primary setup to another room. I complemented myself on a fine job of integrating the Velodyne HGS-10 subs with the KEF Ref 1s, using 40 Hz low-pass with 24 dB/octave. But as I thought about it, I didn’t recall connecting the SMS-1 bass manager to the Ayre KX-5 Twenty preamp. I checked. The subs were not connected. The Ref 1s alone where reproducing that satisfying bass. Amazing for stand mounted monitors. I sure as hell didn’t expect that. To confirm, I played the Saint-Seans 3rd Symphony. Same result. Makes me wonder if I need bother connecting the subs.
Ag insider logo xs@2xdbphd
I'd enjoy a visit from you.  I have two setups: (1) Ayre 5 Twenty series digital hub, preamp, and amp with KEF Ref 1s, and (2) Senore microRendu, Ayre Codex, and Ayre A7e amp with LS50s.  Lots of Parasound stuff boxed to sell; beginning to wonder about setup 1.  I think we're a year or two down the waiting list for Casa Dorinda.  Perhaps a pair of KEF LS50s arrayed with a pair of Velodyne HGS-15 and a pair of HGS-10s would satisfy my audio needs.
Post removed 
dbphd:
    "I’m skeptical of your last sentence. The Ayre preamp connects to the SMS-1 which connects to the subs. I never use subs without acoustic room correction."

Hello dbphd,     
     Millercarbon , clio09 and myself all have experience using 4-sub DBA systems in our rooms and know there's absolutely no need for mics, room correction or bass room treatments.
     However, it seems you're determined to use the SMS-1 with room correction in your new room.  I agree with clio09 that you should use what you're comfortable with but I'm not as confident as clio09 that you'll accomplish the same results from either a DBA with no room correction and a master SMS-1 for your two 15s and a slave SMS-1 for your two 10s (see the bottom of page 10 on your SMS-1 manual for setup instructions on this).
     As I stated on my last post:
     "My overall impression is that the SMS-1 and the DBA system have the same goal, to achieve accurate natural and smooth in-room bass response, but through different methods. It strikes me that the SMS-1 method is trying to simulate digitally what our brains do naturally with the DBA method.  
      The SMS-1 approach is attempting to smooth or even out bass peaks and dips in a room through room analysis using test tones and mics, digital conversion and processing along with parametric equalization. It's more proficient at reducing bass peaks than boosting bass dips since boosting all bass dips of various frequencies and decibels needs to be done more judiciously to prevent overstressing the sub or subs.
    The DBA approach is attempting to smooth out bass peaks and dips in a room through creating more peaks and dips and relying upon the proven psycho acoustic principle of our brains summing and averaging these peaks and dips which results in a perceived accurate and smooth in-room bass response. It's equally proficient at reducing bass peaks and boosting bass dips since boosting all bass dips of various frequencies and decibels requires no increased bass output from the sub or subs.
      I'm certain the 4-sub DBA system works like a charm without any mics, room analysis, room correction software or hardware, parametric equalization and room treatments."

      However,I've never used or heard a 4-sub DBA system configured through an SMS-1 and utilizing room correction so I'm not certain how well this method would work.  
     The reason I'm skeptical is because it seems to me that the two methods would be working against one another.  The DBA concept is based on producing numerous more bass peaks and dips in the room while the SMS-1 room control concept is based on reducing as many bass peaks and boosting as many bass dips in the room as possible.  
     I hope the net effect of this dueling bass response concepts results in an overall positive result but, having no experience using both at the same time, I really have no idea what the results will be.
     Hopefully, you'll have your two 15s repaired by the time the experienced clio09 arrives for a visit and you guys can figure out a good solution.  I'd love to join in and help out but I'm in Indiana and have no plans to be in L.A. anytime soon.

     Good luck and please repost here detailing how things worked out.

Thanks,
  Tim
Tim,

I appreciate your advice. Tony’s visit is motivation to haul the HGs-15s to LA for repair.

As I’m sure you’re aware, an SMS-1 emits a series of pulses through the subs that are captured by its microphone, evaluated, and equalization applied that mainly cuts peaks without amplifying valleys. The process can be for one or multiple subs, so I see no downside in using it. On the other hand, the SMS-1 remote includes an equalization defeat button making it trivial to try the array both with equalization and without.

I had a Marchand 4th order 80 Hz fully balanced passive high-pass filter built for use between the Ayre KX-5 Twenty preamp and VX-5 Twenty amp that I’m not now using. I might want to install that and set the low-pass to 4th order 80 Hz. I’ll trust Tony’s listening judgement on that.

db
@dbphd, We may have spoken about this before so forgive me if I am repeating myself, but have you tried a 100 Hz cut off? Does your Marchand have a high pass cut off as well or are you running the Kef’s full range?

I think for Casa Dorinda the system I would like to see you use is the Ayre 5 Twenty with the Codex, Sonore, and LS50s. Add 4 subs to that and be done with it.

Won’t head down that way until late July so that should give you enough time to get the subs repaired.