chakster and lew, this goes back nearly a year, but I have a question on your counterweight stem discussion.
A few years ago I bought a MS-505S. That has a similar design where the stem is separated by a rubber cushion aft of the pivot point. Once I obtained the arm I discovered the stem was not in the same plane as the arm tube. Searching online I found conflicting opinions as to whether this was "normal" or not. At that time Jim Howard was still around so I consulted with him. He said it was deteriorated suspension and not normal, so I had him rebuild mine.
To the point, I don't remember specifics from physics class, but it does not seem desirable for a counterweigh to be too flexible on one side of a fulcrum if we want the other end (stylus) to have a stable platform. Isn't that the tail wagging the dog?
A few years ago I bought a MS-505S. That has a similar design where the stem is separated by a rubber cushion aft of the pivot point. Once I obtained the arm I discovered the stem was not in the same plane as the arm tube. Searching online I found conflicting opinions as to whether this was "normal" or not. At that time Jim Howard was still around so I consulted with him. He said it was deteriorated suspension and not normal, so I had him rebuild mine.
To the point, I don't remember specifics from physics class, but it does not seem desirable for a counterweigh to be too flexible on one side of a fulcrum if we want the other end (stylus) to have a stable platform. Isn't that the tail wagging the dog?