I started off smitten by electrostatics. I owned Quad ESL 63s, and later also added the Gradient dipole subwoofers made especially for the Quads - still I think the most seamless dynamic woofer/stat blend I've heard, even including the ML hybrids. (I've heard tons of different ML speakers).
I have of course encountered most of the largest electrostatics exhibited at audio shows. Aside from that I also have more personal, extended experience with various designs. As for "full range," depending on your definition, I use to listen to the ML CLS, I also had a fair amount of time, on and off over a few weeks, listening to my music on the giant full-range A1 Sound Labs, and I also used to listen to a huge double-stacked Quad ESL57s set up at another acquaintance's house.
I still love electrostatics for their particular strengths - I don't even have to mention them as I think most of us know that electrostatic sound.But for me I can't ultimately be satisfied with electrostatics. They just move air in a different way that to me sounds detached and somewhat weightless and skeletal, like I'm viewing the performers through a window in to another room, whereas good dynamic speakers have an air-moving dynamic palpability that feels "more real" and/or that connects me more with the music. Dynamic speakers recreate the performers flesh-and-blood, rather than conjuring up ghosts.
I get why there are fervent fans of electrostats though. They do other aspects of accuracy, believability and realism that...if those are your focus...make them really compelling.