If you have ever read the works of Nobel winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman, he devotes a lot of brainpower and ink to proving that people develop a process of thinking that usually makes it very difficult for them to accept change. Often, completely unbiased analytical data doesn't help with allowing someone to open their minds to the possibility that some process or product may be better. Therefore, we may be talking about the comparative aspects of Class D sound for a while.
Six years ago, I bought a Crown XLS 2000...a $500 Class D amp based on a TI chip. It sounded darn good, solid and deep low end, big soundstage (width but with minimal depth), dynamic and decent but sibilant midrange and top end.
I replaced that amp with a Class A/AB Parasound Halo. It was better in every respect...but still, pianos, trumpets and a few other things didn't seem quite right (and obviously, it could have been the speakers, dac, preamp, wires, etc.)
Then, two months ago I replaced the Halo with another Class D...which should elicit the question WHY a Class D of all things. For exactly the reason that erik suggested...there isn't really a reason to be talking about amplifier classes so much anymore.
At any rate, I bought a 2Cherry from Digital Amplifier Company. If you go to their website https://www.cherryamp.com/dac-home you will see that they are building Class D amplifiers unlike anyone else...bandwidth to 150kz...switching frequencies up to 2mghz...and they don't use modules from anyone else. Their owner/engineer Tommy Obrien designs his own circuits and the builds his amplifiers from discrete components. His stated goal is for his amplifiers to sound like nothing. (Sounds a lot like the specs and statements from the well respected Class A and Class A/AB guys)
Tommy doesn't do paid advertising with anyone so one might assume that the professional reviews he is getting from the magazines might be a little more (skeptical, critical, harsh, etc.) less supportive...but in fact, they love his amplifiers.
Let me say this about the 2Cherry...in comparison to the Halo it replaced...What "shocks" you right away is the incredible level of transparency/clarity that seems to lift a fog that you didn’t know was there which brings the music alive. There is no sibilance, no brightness, no harshness, no artificially pumped up midrange and top end. This amplifier brings you into a detailed, layered, powerful yet delicate soundstage with emotional involvement similar to a live performance.
I think we might all agree that the sound that moves us and the amplifier that brings us that sound is a personal preference...you prefer X and I prefer Y...and one of the beauties is that we have choices. I'm with eric on this one; there is no longer a need to talk about Class D vs other classes...instead focus on what sounds best in your system and be open to the idea that it just might be a Class D amplifier.
Six years ago, I bought a Crown XLS 2000...a $500 Class D amp based on a TI chip. It sounded darn good, solid and deep low end, big soundstage (width but with minimal depth), dynamic and decent but sibilant midrange and top end.
I replaced that amp with a Class A/AB Parasound Halo. It was better in every respect...but still, pianos, trumpets and a few other things didn't seem quite right (and obviously, it could have been the speakers, dac, preamp, wires, etc.)
Then, two months ago I replaced the Halo with another Class D...which should elicit the question WHY a Class D of all things. For exactly the reason that erik suggested...there isn't really a reason to be talking about amplifier classes so much anymore.
At any rate, I bought a 2Cherry from Digital Amplifier Company. If you go to their website https://www.cherryamp.com/dac-home you will see that they are building Class D amplifiers unlike anyone else...bandwidth to 150kz...switching frequencies up to 2mghz...and they don't use modules from anyone else. Their owner/engineer Tommy Obrien designs his own circuits and the builds his amplifiers from discrete components. His stated goal is for his amplifiers to sound like nothing. (Sounds a lot like the specs and statements from the well respected Class A and Class A/AB guys)
Tommy doesn't do paid advertising with anyone so one might assume that the professional reviews he is getting from the magazines might be a little more (skeptical, critical, harsh, etc.) less supportive...but in fact, they love his amplifiers.
Let me say this about the 2Cherry...in comparison to the Halo it replaced...What "shocks" you right away is the incredible level of transparency/clarity that seems to lift a fog that you didn’t know was there which brings the music alive. There is no sibilance, no brightness, no harshness, no artificially pumped up midrange and top end. This amplifier brings you into a detailed, layered, powerful yet delicate soundstage with emotional involvement similar to a live performance.
I think we might all agree that the sound that moves us and the amplifier that brings us that sound is a personal preference...you prefer X and I prefer Y...and one of the beauties is that we have choices. I'm with eric on this one; there is no longer a need to talk about Class D vs other classes...instead focus on what sounds best in your system and be open to the idea that it just might be a Class D amplifier.