The Absolute Sound "review" of USB cable reads suspiciously like a press releaste


I mean c'mon—can't you even throw in a few according-to-the-manufacturer's?

http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/nordost-purple-flare-usb-cable/?mc_cid=1f41b2b3b4&mc_ei...
john_g
2. If the DAC is receiving a degraded waveform and the data recovery circuitry is working hard to sort through it, does this circuitry not increase the electrical noise in the DAC? If so, is it negligible or does that just depend on the DAC design?

It's a bit complicated because it's not like you have a usb data hooked up directly to DAC.  You have a usb data that has to go to different hardware protocol before it gets to the actual DAC.  And on top of that, you have the software on top of it to control everything.

This could be a long explanation especially if one may not have a background in electrical engineer.  

Now there two different USB DAC architectures - synchronous and asynchronous.  Synchronous was an old architecture which was susceptible to jitter and clock.  Most DAC nowaday probably use asynchronous.  This architecture essentially, at least in theory, eliminate the effects of jitter, which means even if the input USB data has a lot of jitter, the DAC will be affect.  The detail why is a bit complicated.  

Now my turn to pose the question (especially to wynpalmer4 since he claims to have a design background), because the asynchronous architecture essentially eliminates the effects of jitter, why then the USB cable would make any difference?  (Assuming you still have bit perfect which is not that unreasonable)
Come on...its a Nordhost product.  Starting out it is well made, over priced and of questionable efficacy.   A poor value even if it does make a difference.
A poor value even if it does make a difference.

Why would it make a difference though?  That is a question I'd like to know.

@tom32801


The "fiddling" I did with USB cables is to try a few.  I had started with a basic DH Labs USB cable, and I received a freebie Supra Sword USB cable rolled in with some gear that I bought, so I tried that.  I could hear no difference at all.  None.

Then some months later the importer of my DAC recommended a Final Touch Audio Callisto USB cable that other owners were really liking.  Wow.  It was like when I discovered what a really good power cord brings to the party.  My digital took some important steps to a truer sound, gaining some more information, and with an uncanny greater coherence and palpability, like the focus sharpened at the micro detail level and fleshed out harmonics, space, and dynamic shading a bit better all together.  And really feeling coherent.  The sum total is surprising to me, and it has certainly converted me to a believer that USB cabling matters.
For very high frequency applications like USB cables wouldn’t pure silver strands or silver plated copper strands be best, given that the signals travel very close to the surface of the conductors? Controlling the USB cables for directionality - as Audioquest does - also seems like a splendid idea. 🤗 I also like their “shield the shield” idea.

I’m a proud owner of Audioquest Carbon HDMI cables, which employ similar concepts. See link below for Audioquest web page for Carbon USB cable description,

https://www.audioquest.com/cables/digital-cables/usb-a-to-b/carbon