The recordings I’ve personally done, take me back to the venues, in which they were made. That’s always been my goal, in the home. Long as my system accomplishes that, I know I’m recreating whatever ambient info is contained in my other media, as well. Of course; then there are studio recordings, with electronic effects, manipulated by someone moving knobs/faders, to create the illusion of a space and sounds expanding/decaying into it. If my system does the first correctly, I know I’ll experience, whatever that guy intended(and laid down). That’s my personal preference/experience, regarding the issue. Obviously; there are other tastes. Can’t wait to hear from those that have never heard, or don’t know how to listen for a, "sound stage" or, "sound field"(the ambiance/Sabine signature of a venue), and how live instruments sound in one. You know: the, "If-I-can’t-hear-it-it-doesn’t-exist" and/or the, "if-my-system-can’t-do-it-it’s-some-kind-of-distortion" contingent.
- ...
- 75 posts total
Hi Erik, You’ll find the following thread from 2010 to be of interest, as it discussed exactly the same question: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/quot-they-are-here-quot-vs-quot-you-are-there-quot I had a number of lengthy posts in that thread, but the bottom line in my case was (and is): Almarg 9-5-2010 Best regards, -- Al |
Both. Since my listening room is as small as a small venue I can enjoy both. A listening room that is too small (like a bedroom) tends to leave too much of its own sonic signature. Same with a very large room like a gymnasium. In between is ideal - around 5000 cubic feet being optimal. There should be plenty of space behind the listener. |
- 75 posts total