glupson - Correct that CDs don't fail very often, the laser is usually at fault. 1 or 2 out of 7,000 CDs made since 1984 have failed me. I make it a point to clean the laser every year (1,000 hours) or sooner. It makes a difference with 80+ minute CDs (London classical reissues sometimes go to 85 minutes).
Elizabeth and roxy54 - I 100% agree. The mastering is numero uno in the resulting quality of vinyl and CD. Just last night, I played Turandot/Mehta on a London CD but when the chorus came in, it was a hashy mess. I put the LP Decca version on and bliss, full, detailed sound. (Why do so many of my London opera CDs sound like poor quality remastering compared to the LPs whereas London's mono classical sound superior to their LPs)?
I went through about 40 used CD players from 1985 to 2000 (mostly average quality/$500-$1500 Denon, Sony, Yamaha, Marantz etc.) until I found the EAR Acute 1 in 2007. Audio nirvana with NOS tubes and cabling. My friend upgraded his CD only system with a COS Engineering DAC using a Pioneer Elite DV05 as a transport. Yes, it's got superior resolution. I do not have the problems geokaitt claims CDs have with well recorded and mastered CDs. My sound engineered audioroom cost twice as much as my main audio system but it's worth it (only an external tweak here and there, no big change ever again). I have friends who are CD or vinyl only listeners. Funny how they both enjoy my quad front end system (plus RR and 78s). CDs are just easier to use than LPs.
Elizabeth and roxy54 - I 100% agree. The mastering is numero uno in the resulting quality of vinyl and CD. Just last night, I played Turandot/Mehta on a London CD but when the chorus came in, it was a hashy mess. I put the LP Decca version on and bliss, full, detailed sound. (Why do so many of my London opera CDs sound like poor quality remastering compared to the LPs whereas London's mono classical sound superior to their LPs)?
I went through about 40 used CD players from 1985 to 2000 (mostly average quality/$500-$1500 Denon, Sony, Yamaha, Marantz etc.) until I found the EAR Acute 1 in 2007. Audio nirvana with NOS tubes and cabling. My friend upgraded his CD only system with a COS Engineering DAC using a Pioneer Elite DV05 as a transport. Yes, it's got superior resolution. I do not have the problems geokaitt claims CDs have with well recorded and mastered CDs. My sound engineered audioroom cost twice as much as my main audio system but it's worth it (only an external tweak here and there, no big change ever again). I have friends who are CD or vinyl only listeners. Funny how they both enjoy my quad front end system (plus RR and 78s). CDs are just easier to use than LPs.