Hear my Cartridges....🎶

Addendum to my Post above:

During the month that one of my DM-58 Monoblocks was being repaired......I was forced to listen through headphones (Audeze LCD-2 Magnetic Planars with Schiit Audio Lyr Valve Headphone Amp).
Having listened to my cartridges for 40 years solely through speakers...I was unable to recognise or differentiate any of my cartridges through the headphones.
The sense of transparency, soundstage, depth of field, bass location, room dynamics etc were all missing and thus my 'knowledge' of the specific cartridge traits had disappeared.
This is not to say Frogman, that your method of listening through headphones is flawed.....only that it's far far different from the way I experience my cartridges in my listening room.
Could you perhaps try to listen through speakers (or iPad) to see if you can hear some differences in presentation?

Regards

Thanks for the comments, Halcro.  Somehow, I feel we are not connecting with what we are each trying to say re our experiences and descriptions.  Dover is correct by pointing out that sometimes once a shortcoming or difference is identified it renders the component, if not always unlistenable, then obviously flawed.  I understand that you enjoy all the cartridges in your collection.  I would too; you have many of the best.  However, I still want to understand what about them, in this case the Shure and Decca, you hear as different from each other?  I approach this exercise (and the hobby in general) from the standpoint of determining which component gets me closer to the sound of music as I (!) know it.  Once that is established then one component necessarily becomes superior to the other and the other inferior.  I also don’t particularly enjoy swapping out components.  In the case of cartridges I have found that once I find a cartridge that I like, I prefer to live with it for some time and learn how very small adjustments in set up can optimize the sound.  Just one of the many reasons that I live the ET2; it makes this possible and easy.  I am a bit perplexed as to why  I keep getting the feeling that there is resistance to the idea that one cartridge might be superior to the other.  Again, they can’t all be equally good.

**** But they CAN all be wrong....even the LDR.****

Exactly right!  And, once again, proof of just how far removed even the best are from “the absolute sound”.  

But, some get closer to it than others.  And that is what I hear and try to describe.  The differences may be very subtle, but they are there.  To me, the Decca sounds closer to the sound of music as I know it than the Shure does.  So, if that is to be the case, then there have to be differences between the two.  I suspect that you are reacting more strongly to what I am describing as the differences (and reason for the preference) than is warranted?  Also keep in mind that, as should be obvious, that for me the most important aspect of all this is to all issues.  For me that is the most important aspect of it all.  

**** Could you perhaps try to listen through speakers (or iPad) to see if you can hear some differences in presentation? ****

I have!  And not just for comparing cartridges.  I have been doing so for many years.  Not only do I not think the method is flawed, I have found that for determining differences in timbre and things like musical phrasing my Stax/tube driver setup is superior to speaker listening.  Keep in mind that my speakers are also electrostatics (Stax F81) or transmission line (Paragon Regent).  As good as the Paragons are they are no match for the Stax as far as faithfulness to tonal issues.  I will concede that headphones are inferior to good speakers as far as sound staging issues are concerned.  But, those are secondary concerns for me.  Btw, about a year ago a friend who owns the Audeze and I did a comparison to my Stax and while the Audeze sounds very good I (and he) felt that the Stax did a better job of revealing tonal differences as well being more rhythmically lithe.  The Audeze setup was very good, but to me was overly full sounding.  I kept thinking “this reminds me of the sound of better Grado cartridges”.  

Thanks for the comments and comparisons and keep them coming.  

Thanks for the comments Dover.
There have been more than a few cartridges I've had that "I simply cannot stand"......two of them, much-acclaimed LOMCs with $12,000 pricetags 😱
In these cases, I sell them off fairly quickly....
Of the other 50 I still have, they all have "shortcomings" but also they all have 'something' that enlightens me and their "shortcomings" are not significant enough (nor annoying enough) to prevent my enjoyment.

Unfortunately....I 'fried' my original XV-1s (don't ask) and sent it to Axel who saved it by rewiring the coils (and replacing the stylus).
In doing so, he reduced the output to about 0.12mV but it sounded good 😃
Then one day......the right channel 'burnt out' 🥵
And I haven't decided if I liked it enough (in comparison to some of my other cartridges) to send it to Peter Ledermann.....?

The spell check gremlins strike again.  In my last post (in case it matters)....

**** as should be obvious, that for me the most important aspect of all this is to all issues. ****

.... should read:

” as should be obvious, that for me the most important aspect of all this is TONAL issues.”

Regards.

I thought it might be interesting to hear the differences between the two cheap Fidelity Research MM cartridges the FR-5E and FR-6SE.
There are different opinions on which is the better cartridge 🧐
The FR-5E is a low-compliance elliptical stylus on aluminium cantilever obviously designed to suit the heavy Fidelity Research tonearms like the FR-64s and FR-66s.
The FR-6SE is a similarly specified elliptical stylus which cost $210 (on release) compared to the $130 of the 5E.
What the differences are with the 'motor' I have no idea.....?

FIDELITY RESEARCH FR-5E MM Cartridge

FIDELITY RESEARCH FR-6SE MM Cartridge