Is soundstaging emblematic of reality?


Now that finally I have a system that soundstages excellently, I’m wondering if it’s actually  a vital component of a real concert experience.  In most genres of music, unless you’re sitting very close to the action, you don’t get the kind of precise imaging revealed in a good stereo setup.  That’s because microphones are usually (with some rare exceptions) placed close up. If you’re sitting in the middle to back section of an audience (which most people do) you certainly don’t hear anything close to holographic imaging, or even what most people accept as satisfactory imaging. 
Granted, it’s loads of fun to hear this soundstaging. And I certainly love it.  Some people might consider it the ideal music experience. But is it an essential component of musical enjoyment?


128x128rvpiano
May and Peter Belt and I conspired to write the explanation ten years ago. Time flies when yer having fun. If time did not exist man would have to invent it.
Post removed 
I’m sure she holds no grudges, your histrionics aside. I didn’t realize it at the time, even though I was in a great many threads on AA and Stereophile forum with May, especially when Michael Green hung out at Stereophile a few years back, going back as far as the Intelligent Chip Wars on AA IN 2005, probably back to 2000, whenever May sat down at the computer to compose her comments Peter was sitting right next to her. Two of the nicest people ever.
Post removed 
What is the alternative to having soundstaging ? Would you prefer that all instruments come from the same space ? All diffuse and unrecognizable . Don't get why you wouldn't want every instrument separated .