To Fuse or Not to Fuse... That is the question!


Ok.. I think I understand that no fuse is better than a cheap fuse. And a good fuse is better than a cheap fuse. But is no fuse better than the best fuse?

One person on Audiogon said that he achieved better sound by using a Blue fuse over no fuse. I guess my question is... Do these new, high dollar fuses just allow the current to flow better with solid protection or do they actually due to quantum physics or something, actually improve upon the signal by eliminating errant bad electrons and thereby actually improving the music over no fuse at all?

I gots to know!


captaindidactic
You WISH I had sheep's clothing...not unlike your pals down on the farm! Count me out of that obsession!
Q. Where does virgin wool come from?

A. From sheep that can run faster than trolls.ย 
You donโ€™t have to be the fastest sheep on the farm. You just have to be faster than the Wolf. ย ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ
If by "tuning" you mean helping a component reach a sound you prefer by applying additional tweaks, a fuse wouldnโ€™t do this as fuses have no impact on performance if applied properly...rated properly, cleaned...thatโ€™s about it. Improvement due to fuse performance is imagined and clearly driven by expectation bias since you might have paid 150 bucks and man...you really want that thing to work as advertised, and you want to see the agreement of other Magic Fuse proponents so you feel better. And hey...maybe you will feel better! Placebos often help people.


amen!!!
soo true and twice true in the classic car and race car industry. if its cost me more it must have resulted in a better result.
most physical things have a celing of dimesering returns.
proven by the govt spending multimillions and finding out a hammer is just a hammer.