Cryogenically treated cables

Feel free to point out what specifically as "jibber jabber". Your post is jibber jabber. You are trying to dismiss my arguments out of hand, but you cannot even address them. Why is it that you cannot actually address my arguments? Is it that you cannot? That makes your post text-book jibber-jabber.


I am neither skeptical nor reactionary. Again, based on your last post (and others before), I would say you are projecting your own emotional mindset on me. Addressing my arguments would go a long way to prove I am not right. So have at it ... address my arguments.

What you call skepticism, I call reality. Given the number of industries and scientific endeavours that require signal transmission properties far stricter than audio, surely there must be a body of work discussing the benefits of cryogenic treatment of cables for signal transmission?

You like quotes, here is one for you:

“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

– Mark Twain

geoffkait17,964 posts11-04-2019 10:38amSorry if I’m being too harsh but that last positive a whole lotta jibber jabber. If you don’t know just say you don’t know. There’s no reason to be so skeptical and reactionary. There is no basis whatsoever for your speculation except you skepticism. No offense to you personally.

“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

– Mark Twain

Hold on, geoffkait likes to use that one. He is getting a copyright on all the quotes he can find. Quotes by other people, I mean. His were rejected by the ethics committee.

This habit of yours to completely change the text in your posts ... significantly after you have posted it, really has to stop .... no worries, I was nice enough to capture the original post already.


I have a document that clearly says I am the world’s smartest and strongest dad. My son made it when I was about 5 years old. It carries about as much validity of me being the world’s smartest and strongest dad as the so called "documentation" you assert for cryogenic treatment in audio has audible improvements.

Many many many people, in many areas will swear that "something" does "something" when it does nothing or even does harm. Above average intelligence is not some magic shield for this either unfortunately.

geoffkait17,964 posts11-04-2019 10:38amSorry if I’m being too harsh but that last post is mostly pure speculation. The history of cryogenics for audio is long and colorful and well documented. There’s no reason to be so skeptical and reactionary. Heck, I broke three Laws of Physics today already and it’s not even lunchtime.

Except for the fact that it is me who is the world’s strongest and smartest, other things are correct. I do not have any document about it but it is true. Only pseudo-skeptics would argue this well-known fact.

atdavid, be advised I have 30 minutes to edit my posts. I sometimes take all 30. It would be wise to wait the customary 30 minutes before responding. That way there won’t be any misunderstanding. Besides, your recent spate of responses has taken the tone of a stubborn pseudo-skeptic. Are aren’t the first cowboy to come down the pike slapping your EE 301 book on your knee. Furthermore, it’s not proper protocol for newcomers to question the experience of forum members. I have been cryoing and freezing since you were wearing white socks.