The science of opinion ...


Some may find this interesting (it is).

Some may find this threatening (it isn't, it is science).

Some may read it and use it to help them understand the dynamics of internet forums.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078433
atdavid
It’s the old James Randi scam, just on a cheaper scale. When Randi couldn’t get any more action from drunks, dowsers and spoon benders he got the brilliant idea to go after audiophiles. And an excellent idea it was! It makes sense when you think about. From the skeptics’ point of view how can cables sound different? How can quantum mechanics have anything to do with sound? How can audiophiles be so gosh darn sure of what they hear? Enter the Million Dollar Blind Test Scam, I mean Challenge.

News Flash!! The AES is not (rpt not) made up of audiophiles. It’s made up of....pseudo skeptics.
When it comes to Audio Engineering Society, I have been on audiogon long enough to think I am qualified to participate...

http://www.aes.org/blog/2019/10/microagressionsinaudiosurvey

asvjerry,
...guess all the old codgers 'peaked early' and had to go lie down.
Spent over 5 pages ultimately proving the original post and burnt themselves out.

What happened? You could not find your way in? It has been at least 3-4 days for those 5 pages. Come on, we gave you enough time.
Newsflash.
This just in.....

Try more LISTENING to music rather than pointless blathering about semi related and oftimes wholly unrelated topics.

Food for the soul.
Pointless blathering is, in fact, the point.

Listening to music and pointless blathering may not be mutually exclusive.