Are most recordings so bad it's not worth spending large on speakers?


In my interest in finding a speaker with a more lifelike sounding speaker than most monopole - e.g. (bipole, dipole, omnis) I emailed Morrison at Morrison Audio about his omni speakers, which for full range are around $14k. I explained I use my speakers with my TV, and to listen to folk, jazz, blues, some rock.

His response re my music choices, was, "The recordings are dreadful in terms of a lifelike reproduction. You needn’t spend so much on speakers. A monopole pattern is just fine since that is what the recordings are tailored for."

Comments?

cdc2
checkout the just check out the New Spatial Audio Labs open baffle speakers , world class design and drivers the X5,and X3 .reallygood natural sounding speakers and very efficient ,and a 60 day money back guarantee -0 to loose ,they pay shipping to you. Check them out
audio Circle has a forum on them ,maybe here also they beat speakers 
several times their price ,
and the designer Clayton Shaw has been around for years in Audio design.
I think there are meaningful differences even with older or less than perfectly recorded albums/streams. You will still hear things more clearly.

If you want to go from, say $7k to $14k for a pair of speakers is up to you. You should listen to some music you like and see if you think it is worth it. It is also probably a good idea to make sure the system as a whole is balanced. I would for example probably not buy $14k speakers to a $1k amp unless I intended to change that soon after.

If you are going down in price you can also try some of the new active speakers like Dutch & Dutch or Kii Three that have almost everything in the speaker and just needs a streamer or similar to play.
BAD:

1.  of poor quality or a low standard.

2.   not such as to be hoped for or desired; unpleasant or unwelcome.

3.  sucks <== audiophile specific def