How Science Got Sound Wrong

Once again, GeoffKait enters the argument, makes personal insults and jokes, adds absolutely Nothing to the argument, and hijacks the thread making it useless. Unlike Geoffkait’s posts, which are nothing but personal attacks, deflection, and obtuse comments, mine are filled with real information, directly related to the post, and I even provided links to relevant information and downloadable experiments that can be run that show exactly what I am claiming. If you have any, I mean any value at all to add to this thread, you would disprove well anything that I have written .... but no, just more personal attacks because you have ... nothing.   This discussion and the basic premise of the article have little to do with "sound" at all, but whether a digitized system has relative sub-sample timing information. That you attempt to make it about "sound" shows you don't understand the premise of the article and were confused by the title.

Is There A Moderator In The House

terry9,

Here is a paper, it is about ultrasonic imaging, but that is simply a scaling issue w.r.t. frequency. It has nice graphs that clearly illustrate the ability to extract timing information and shows them as a function of sample rate. Even at a relatively low SNR, 30db, the error in extracting timing is very small. The oversampling in this case is 20x the frequency of the waveform:  https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:995652/FULLTEXT01.pdf

I don’t agree with Michael Fremer on his Analog bias , that’s very flawed 
for great digital in several areas surpasses analog 
great digital such as Lampizator with very good usb cable using Vacuum tubes 
is key to bring the so called analog sound , if properly designed ,just because it has a tube doesnot make it good .  Technologies especially digital are getting 
better every year ,vinyl  you have to buy master pressings ,not your 30 year old scratched records , same goes for quality digital. DSD recordings in many ways surpass good vinyl especially per dollar spend in comparison.
that I am convinced having had both. Vinyl now is very time consuming .
for me I don’t see any advantages .