SACD or not


I have a question regarding SACD format. I am looking to replace my CD player and noticed some CD players have the ability to process SACD and some do not.  I have never heard this format and was wondering if I should consider this in my purchase. My purchase price is in the $1400 range
I know people will question why I am using CD at all. That is another discussion for another time. I still like some physical media in my listening experience. 
I look forward to your comments 
schmitty1
It’s true that not every SACD sounds better than a Redbook layer on the same disc, there are some labels that are known for their consistency in quality with SACD.  Channel Classics and BIS are two labels that consistently produce outstanding SACD.  Although a bit quirkier, the German Label Tacet and the Norwegian Label 2L are also outstanding, and simultaneously release their products in Blu Ray Audio.  Pentatone is another label with an extensive SACD offerings.  Most of them are great but there is some variability, as their catalog is divided between recycled Quad recordings from the seventies and newer fare recorded in the last 20 years.  Not all of the old Quad retreads are recommendable—the Masur/Leipzig Gewandhaus Beethoven Symphony cycle, for example.  OTOH,  Pentatone Brahms cycle with Janowski/Pittsburgh is superb, with a great deal of Hall ambience and detailing without spotlighting.
Great responses so I am up to suggestions in the $1400 price range. Rega Apollo no SACD
Arcam SCD50 SACD and DAC
Please feel free to comment on any other new or used. 
Yep, go for a Marantz.  Built like a tank but play with great finesse.  There are many great sounding SACDs out there that are not symphonic in nature.  Get Pink Floyd's "Wish You Were Here" and Clark Terry's "Portraits".  Those discs will allow you to hear what SACD is capable of.
I just listed a Marantz SA-11S1 on Audiomart.  Had the S2 and sold it awhile back.  Great players and I say that owning 2 Marantz and plenty of other CD players.