What is wrong with Audiophiles?


Well, many issues. The pursuit after uber-expensive interconnects, speaker cables, power conditioners, power cables can be rediculous. Not to mention Audiophiles who paint the outer sides of their CD's with a green marker. A few days ago I visited a local hi-fi exhibition in Israel. Two of the most impressive rooms where the YG Acoustics with an all NAGRA amplification and the Focal room. The speaker cables in the first room cost $70,000. That was also the cost of the speaker cable in the Focal room. One could buy a BMW or a Merc AMG or a Porsche for that much money. Does this make sense to you? And, lest I forget, I have an Audiophile neighbor in the building where I live. I offered him to borrow a CD of an Israeli singer that I admire. How is the quality of the recording, he asked. "average", I answered. "No, I can't listen to average recordings", he replied. I call that "Audiophilia neurosis". 
128x128yuvalg9
Is it a sign of the times, a current fashion, the next new thing, to start a thread that provokes? I'm so glad I'm from an earlier generation.

All the best,
Nonoise
True. And in a scientific study conducted from Audio Science Forums recently, 56.67% of the current prison population for sentences related to robbery of gas stations and Seven Eleven stores, identified themselves as audiophiles having spent all their money on cables. Further, it was confirmed that study was conducted blind, in a controlled ABX environment spanning a statistically meaningful sample of the US prison population 
Hey geoff,
What color other than green do you recommend for the edge? Black perhaps? 
Boxer, black should never (rpt never) be used on CDs except for the inner edge. The color black on the outer edge hurts the sound. The color black doesn’t absorb infrared light anyway. Also, the color black should not be used for the label side where it also hurts the sound. Unfortunately, some CDs have a black label. And the colors used in the graphics of CD labels affect the sound because they influence the scattered light. The color Black should always be used for the inner edge. As fate would have it no colors, including black, can affect the invisible infrared scattered light which, as I mentioned is 75% of the scattered laser light. The bandwidth of the CD laser is around 650-850 nm. Nominal wavelength 780 nm. Colors only affect light in the visible portion of the spectrum. A color’s complementary color absorbs that color. So, Turquoise (Cyan) absorbs Red, for example. 

So what be done? As it turns out I used to have a product up until the beginning of the year called DARK MATTER a CD label spray that absorbs invisible infrared scattered light. Then, Dark Matter in conjunction with Green/Turquoise marker for the outer CD edge and my Codename Turquoise masking for the CD tray surface provided a very effective means of reducing scattered laser light. Earlier this year I introduced New Dark Matter that replaced (1) Dark Matter, (2) coloring the CD and (3) covering the CD tray. NOTE: I still use the color BLACK on the inner edge since that particular application of black is not related to light absorption.

New Dark Matter is a set of ultra thin plastic squares that are attached to the upper portion of the CD tray using ultra thin double-sided adhesive squares. Thus NDM is exposed to the scattered laser light during play. Since NDM absorbs light of ALL wavelengths it absorbs the infrared as well as the visible scattered light. NDM can be used for SACD, DVD and Blu Ray discs since it absorbs scattered light of all wavelengths.
FYI, for most folks, is that in the original Philips CD player design..which was the basis for all digital signal reproduction of audio signals  in the environment of home playback ..for almost two decades....that the clock and timing is recovered from the optical reading of the disc.

So, in effect, the optical read quality combined with the mechanical perfection of spin, combined with the quality of the disc itself, in build, disc plastic, labels, optics, etc...becomes, at a minimum... the digital clock jitter itself.

Which in turn, affects the signal reconstruction and becomes the sound quality that we hear and heard.

So, in original non buffered design in cd players (early 80’s to the late 90’s) and associated dacs..the quality of the discs and playback..and all of the hardware, becomes the quality of the music you hear.

Bits are not bits in this case, due to the way the hardware/software worked.

And that is how green markers made a difference for such systems. And how mechanical isolation, disc mats, etc..all contributed to making for better digital audio. As a legacy system, and how discs are read now, some of that still has an effect in physical disc read, in some systems.