What is wrong with Audiophiles?


Well, many issues. The pursuit after uber-expensive interconnects, speaker cables, power conditioners, power cables can be rediculous. Not to mention Audiophiles who paint the outer sides of their CD's with a green marker. A few days ago I visited a local hi-fi exhibition in Israel. Two of the most impressive rooms where the YG Acoustics with an all NAGRA amplification and the Focal room. The speaker cables in the first room cost $70,000. That was also the cost of the speaker cable in the Focal room. One could buy a BMW or a Merc AMG or a Porsche for that much money. Does this make sense to you? And, lest I forget, I have an Audiophile neighbor in the building where I live. I offered him to borrow a CD of an Israeli singer that I admire. How is the quality of the recording, he asked. "average", I answered. "No, I can't listen to average recordings", he replied. I call that "Audiophilia neurosis". 
128x128yuvalg9
Here is a simple challenge for you geoff ...

Go find a spectrum for the laser diode in a CD ... should be easy. Now look at that spectrum.

There is not visible red in the spectrum of the laser, and yes, that cheap laser diode, like all laser diodes are pretty much monochromatic unless designed otherwise. It is not a super sharp wavelength single mode, but even a dirt cheap multi-mode is monochromatic. There may be leakage in the 700-720nm, but it is almost none and would required a dark room to see. Many transports added a red diode inside the assembly to give people comfort "something" was happening. Since the optical detector is focused on the spot, minor stray light is not much of an issue. Look at the second half of this video and how hard it is for the person to even detect the CD laser:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df70YVAg-iI

Many green inks will absorb 780nm. That proves nothing at all except that people who promote things like using green ink (as opposed to some other color) don’t understand much about absorption spectrum of dies and inks. Let’s not forget the optics are also focused, so most scattered light is rejected.

And you are wrong, almost all black inks will absorb 780nm. Again easily proven, just look up absorption spectrums of black inks and dyes. The "color-wheel" only tells you what happens when the light is visible. It tells you nothing about what happens to light on a colored substance when you use non-visible light. You are guessing at what happens and guessing wrong.

All the ad-hominems in the world will not change that You Are Wrong. You keep slinging ad-hominems, I will keep slinging verifiable facts. Let’s see who most people believe.




Re. Atdavid's:  "I will keep slinging verifiable facts. Let’s see who most people believe." 

We'll believe you, atdavid.  Unfortunately that won't stop the other... He will continue to bleat and repeat the same nonsense including such hits as:

Off the Grid
My Walkman
Wire Direction
Pseudo Skeptics
Uh, oh, the Cargo Cult is growing. Speaking of bleating you’ve been following the wrong sheep 🐑 🐑 🐑 🐑🚶🏻‍♂️The hat’s real cool looking. 🙄
Post removed 
So true, ml8764ag, but you forgot:


  • Wikipedia cut and paste (thrown at anyone who knows more than him).

Alas, he was nice enough to bring it up for you :-)  .... and nice enough of him to prove my point that as opposed to addressing what I wrote, he just slings ad-homs.