How Science Got Sound Wrong

In other words, the “standard model“ of how humans hear, how the neurons carry the signal from the ears to the brain that is the complete explanation of how we hear is utter BS.

Now I have to read whole thread to find out about these differences.

As a start, I would like to remind any interested party that hairstyles may, in theory, influence the sound more than Gadolinium infused power cord cover.

Is there a thread about audiophile hairstyles?

Ok you're getting much too technical. When I play analog there is more toe tapping, body movements etc with keeping to the beat. I don't have that same experience playing digital much at all. Taking to account the wow and flutter of analog playback systems then I should be toe tapping etc much more to digital! Maybe the analogy of tubes vs solid state would fit here. Tubes have much more distortion but the harmonics are not as offensive as solid state. Just rattling off here. 

glubsong
Is there a thread about audiophile hairstyles?

>>>It’s my understanding audiophiles don’t have hair. They did have hair. Just not any more.

Talking about weird haircuts ...

https://www.boredpanda.com/funny-hair-styles/?utm_source=search.yahoo&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=organic

It appears a certain somebody has taken a new tack. When you can’t dazzle them with brilliance snow them with verbosity. Ya know, that might actually work! Good job! But I’m betting there are more than a few Strawmen hiding in there.