2. misc-audio
  3. 152372-2693

How Science Got Sound Wrong

I don't believe I've posted this before or if it has been posted before but I found it quite interesting despite its technical aspect. I didn't post this for a digital vs analog discussion. We've beat that horse to death several times. I play 90% vinyl. But I still can enjoy my CD's.  

https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil...
artemus_5
glupson
7,842 posts
 
geoffkait18,384 posts

"Is there a mechanism that thwarts to some degree the posting of obvious inflammatory troll posts?"
There are 18 384 proofs on this forum there is no such mechanism.

And evidence is growing.
mapman's avatar
mapman
22,911 posts
 
How Science Got Sound Wrong

Let me guess.   People who know nothing about science trying to take over?


atdavid
736 posts
 
Nope, an article by an actual scientist ... just not an actual scientist on the technology most applicable to the article.

mapman16,341 posts11-20-2019 8:22pm
How Science Got Sound Wrong

Let me guess.  People who know nothing about science trying to take over?

taras22
412 posts
 
Kinda curious.... what exactly is the most applicable technology hear, errr, here ?

Keeping in mind technology in the simplest form can be defined as....

the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry."advances in computer technology"
  • machinery and equipment developed from the application of scientific knowledge.
  • the branch of knowledge dealing with engineering or applied sciences.


Using resources to solve a problem (such as knowledge, skills, processes, techniques, tools and raw materials).
atdavid
736 posts
 
Timing resolution of digitized bandwidth limited signals.
More to discover