new GAN amplifier

Wrong on both counts.

A lower damping factor will, and especially in the case of the Alexia where one just has to look at the frequency response/impedance curve to see it, often correct peaks (valleys) in the frequency response. It is like a built in equalizer :-)

And .... most people don't know this, so I will not fault you, but high damping factor often results in more distortion in dynamic drivers. So no, high damping factor is not always better. Different yes, but better ... not necessarily so.

I will ask you this once. Stop insinuating I have any sort of business relationship with atmasphere. It is inflamatory and wrong. Stick to the facts, period.

in the case of the Alexia where one just has to look at the frequency response/impedance curve to see it, often correct peaks (valleys) in the frequency response. It is like a built in equalizer :-)

You are **** ** *t , the OTL’s are fixing nothing, they just can’t drive those Alexia loads, (and are a tone control because of it), read carefully, they say it twice.:
Stereophile on Alexia
" The peak in the midbass is entirely due to the nearfield measurement technique."
" The broad peak in the midbass will be mostly due to the nearfield measurement technique"

More more you two try to gig your way out of this BS, the more ridiculous you look, with your comments made about OTL’s trying to drive speakers with horror loads like the Wilson Alexia’s ect ect.
Next I’ll put money on is you’ll drag out the (autoformer band-aid fix) solution.

in the case of the Alexia where one just has to look at the frequency response/impedance curve to see it, often correct peaks (valleys) in the frequency response. It is like a built in equalizer :-)

You are both "Dreamer’s", the OTL’s are NOT fixing/correcting anything, as there’s nothing to fix on the Alexia’s.
They can’t drive those Alexia loads, because of "lousy damping factor" and "minuscule current delivery" (and are a tone control because of it) not "equalizing" as you say, read carefully, Stereophile say it twice.
Stereophile on Alexia:
" The peak in the midbass is entirely due to the nearfield measurement technique."
" The broad peak in the midbass will be mostly due to the nearfield measurement technique"

The more you both try to dig your way out of this nonsense, the more ridiculous you look. With your comments made about OTL’s and them trying to drive speakers like these Wilson Alexia’s ect ect that have horror loads.

Next I’ll put money on is you’ll drag out the (autoformer band-aid fix) solution.

Please compare data for your favorite top A/B amp U-LD Mk4, given by the creators at www.siliconchip.com.au (August 2015) and the newest D-class from Bruno Putzeys - Purifi 1ET400A (www.purifi-audio.com).

Best to use third party measurements such as these... https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/review-and-measurements-of-purifi-1et400a-amplifier.7984/page-1

Distortion (IMD) is still higher than a decent classic blameless AB design above 10kHz.

The Hypex modules I'm using sound pretty good as full range amplifiers, but with the AB driving mids / tweeters the fidelity goes to another level.  

As Putzeys himself has stated, Class D amplifiers sound good in spite of being class D, not because of it.