it's the reviewer that matters if he is close to you in taste you should listen to him.so first you have to understand what he likes. you can tell by looking at his reference gear or the tracks that he uses. than if he is not biased (big magazines are always suspect )everything he says comes to the right context. john darko shows what music he listens to and it's not the usual geeky "audiophile"stuff . metal571 is a great reviewer but he likes flat headphones so he can drastically eq them to death. he loves the hd 800 which has harsh highs and no bass(best suited for classical music) and hates the nighthawks while most of the other reviewers (zeus guttenberg darko and many more)love them and hate the 800. if they say "fast and detailed bass" it means no bass if they say "warm" you have to know compared to what?
generally comparisons are the best (amp a has more bass than amp b!).sometimes i read a buyer's remark on amazon and it's better than an hour of video review...
Publications and websites for equipment reviews
I stopped reading audio mags years ago . . . what are the current go-to sites for equipment reviews, especially on mid- to hi-fi gear? I can think of
Stereophile
The Absolute Sound
What Hifi
C-Net
Others? Thanks in advance. Comments on the credibility of publications are welcome, but it would be great if the whole discussion didn't devolve into poo-flinging!
Stereophile
The Absolute Sound
What Hifi
C-Net
Others? Thanks in advance. Comments on the credibility of publications are welcome, but it would be great if the whole discussion didn't devolve into poo-flinging!
- ...
- 20 posts total
- 20 posts total