Thanks for running that test. Your findings are conclusive.
New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies
Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.
In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.
With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.
As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.
- ...
- 1343 posts total
Not, so fast there, kemo sabe. There are quite a few legitimate reasons why the sound got better, I mean other than the mat. It’s important I think to keep a log to be able to figure the whole “cause and effect” thing out. It’s part and parcel of the scientific method. Weather conditions, time of day, day of week, changes made casually to the system, taking things out of the room. This is a little bit too anecdotal. Any of this sound familiar? No single test is conclusive but isn’t it pretty to think so. 🌹 🌹 |
thecarpathian ... I have a feeling that if you had left the + mats out of the system for a week or two instead of only two days, you would have noticed a more profound difference when putting them back in. Just a thought. Frank |
oregonpapa, Luckily for you, you have retired. Although, I still have a hard time believing you approached your sales the way you approach sales of Omega Mat. Unless you were a part of geoffkait's comedy troop. No, I will not bother the lady at this, or any, moment. It is a bit disturbing that you use her in this argument. I hope she does well with her company. Regardless of the reason people enjoy her products. |
- 1343 posts total