New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies


Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.

In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.

With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.

As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.


128x128jafreeman

This is not an ad, but just for illustration how it can be done on a website.


Eventually, how efficient the product is will be very individual experience. Still, claims about patents are clearly supported as are some of the technical details and measurements. Just a link at the bottom of the page.


Clear, concise, no room left for doubts. No need for an online forum defense.


https://www.theragun.com/

https://www.theragun.com/us/en-us/patents.html


I have nothing to do with above company, but have ran across the website last night.

Has the FTC ever investigated an audiophile product? I mean, really. How about Better Business Bureau? AES? Better Homes and Gardens? Would a simple sticker DO NOT EAT be sufficient to avoid legal consequences? Yes, I know. That’s a lot of questions. Has any audiophile device ever been found to be a hoax? That’s another question. Not even the Tice Clock? The Intelligent Chip? The Schumann frequency generator? Super expensive power cords or cables? The Teleportation Tweak? Has The James Randi Educational Foundation ever threatened to kick a tweak manufacturer’s a$$? The answer, gentle readers, to the last question is Yes!
Glubson ...

Please state your intent in posting in this thread. Thanks ..

Frank

oregonpapa,

Preventing a few of you making a lady's company a joke by your comments. She asked for help. None of you have done anything about it except made it seem like it is a joke made by bitter men who enjoy bickering on an anonymous Internet forum.

Along the way, I noticed imperfections on the website that, once rectified, will make it all seem more credible. I also followed comments here trying to get an idea how many of the staunch proponents have bought The Gate. That could shed some light on how well the business may do in the future in the North American and English-speaking markets altogether.

I also checked a few Asian websites and looked at the traffic regarding power conditioners there. There are many more names than here. I suggested that the lady focuses on Asia rather than this small group not willing to do much more than fairly disjointed lip service.


And what have you done?

The mats could be working on a couple of levels certainly not RF or just RF as Geoff stated.. Surface treatment on speaker bezels or speaker screens or some devices on acoustic instruments benefit from TC is not RF related. Of course TC is different that the Mat..but they both have a break in period which indicates to me they do not work on RF. Tom