How Science Got Sound Wrong

" (you edited to offer the buffing comment) "
  Ended up having to buff the top only because the engraving left a bit of roughness to the edges for one and I like the satin look it gives as a contrast to the shiny cavity.

Arguably rarely right. The naysayer is almost always wrong. Sometimes they are right, and they end up with a Nobel prize, not selling a "Teleportation Tweak" to gullible customers.

teo_audio1,258 posts11-27-2019 9:10am

I’m the most successful one selling things on this site.

Is Teleportation Tweak considered a "thing" or it is some other state of non-being?

The problem for the naysayers is that the science and the physics has always supported what he is doing and what he is saying. It has no method of disproving him -- rather the opposite, in fact.

glupson

I’m the most successful one selling things on this site.

Is Teleportation Tweak considered a "thing" or it is some other state of non-being?

>>>>That’s a commendable question. Personally I’m not sure what it should be considered. But I know it’s both the lightest audiophile tweak AND the only audiophile tweak that doesn’t involve shipping or costs thereof. It also cannot be reversed, unlike phone calls. Yet, it is guaranteed. You don’t see that kind of customer support too much, I’m afraid.

Audiophile tweaks are like pudding. The proof is in the eating. No technical arguments or explanations are required. And if one is desired I have the definitive explanation of how the Teleportation Tweak works on my web site.

atdavid
Arguably rarely right. The naysayer is almost always wrong. Sometimes they are right, and they end up with a Nobel prize, not selling a "Teleportation Tweak" to gullible customers.

“If I could explain it to the average Joe Blow they wouldn’t have given me the Nobel prize.”

“People would generally be much better off in their lives if they believed in too much rather than too little.” - PT Barnum (gee, that quote seems tailor made for Mr. Smarty Pants 👖)

Sometimes doubting is only a misplaced, or disguised faith... And true doubting really implicate a dedication to truth that is incompatible with any prosaic discourse (except poetry ) be it a theological one or even with some science discourse...

Question: how is it that some scientific discourse, for example darwinism, is kilometers away, parsecs away perhaps, from scientific thinking process ?


I apologize for my rant, because it is perhaps all over my head... :)