New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies


Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.

In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.

With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.

As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.


128x128jafreeman
I am going to be blunt as a brick now and if it lasts as long as last post oh well I tried.

I have absolutely zero interest in entering into any discourse with members Glupson and Atdavid.

Both have proven to be extremely obtuse and incapable of logical postings.

Now have a great Thanksgiving gentlemen but I will tarry here no longer.
No one, including myself, has figured out how the mats do what they do, but let’s go over Tim’s clues again:

The mats have no crystals--they are solid state.
The mats do not lose their effectiveness over time.
The mat’s field is not blocked by 2" granite, 1" aluminum or by 1/2" rolled steel---insofar as the materials he listed.
The magnetized surface of the mat does not activate or rely on its power to improve sound.
The mats improve over about two weeks.
If you remove a mat, you have about an hour to replace it, or you will basically be starting over on your two weeks.
Cutting a mat in half or in pieces will destroy its power to affect what you want improved.

From these clues, it seems fair to say the mats pair a field of action with the component or device near to where you have placed it. This field is not easily blocked by common materials that house or support your system.

Tim may have given more clues over the many threads these past months. Krissy may have to make corrections and maybe add more if she chooses. Frank, you may recall some things, too, that would be informative.  Others close to the owners may want to clarify some things, as well.  The intent here is not to "figure the mats out" in an intrusive way--only to describe their use and effectiveness. 

All in all, the main purpose here is to discuss the products from experience and out of curiosity in those who may want to try them. These are important products that are not to be derided as fraudulent, nor or users of these products here to be bullied. Now, let’s have insightful and respectful discussion, or none at all.

This above may be the start. More like the start of a guessing game, quiz of sorts, but at least some start in establishing character of the product.

If I remember correctly, these are the first words in some direction on this thread. Far from satisfying, but we may get there.

If I may suggest that non-users of this product are not to be bullied, either.

Now, who has more thoughts we can learn from, please step forward.
Post removed