New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies


Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.

In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.

With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.

As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.


128x128jafreeman
atdavid, Wow. I am really, REALLY starting to question your comprehension skills. If you would re-read the meaning of the 'adjective patented' as opposed to the meaning of the 'noun patented' it makes your point meaningless. I guess it was a little too hard for you after all....

thecarpathian,

I apologize, I was trying to make your quote easier to read omitting the embarrassing part about "mystery".


Nobody is allowed to know anything in this story except believe in personal opinions of people they have never met and who seem to be overly excitable when describing a product. I will not claim Omega + Mat does not work. I will claim it seems less and less likely that it works. Not one credible fact has been mentioned. Not one.

Allowed to know anything? We can’t tell you what we do not know ourselves.
I have been nothing but truthful in my assessment of the Omega+ mat. That is all I can do. It is up to the individual whether he or she chooses to believe me or not and pursue further interest.
I am now going to enjoy a hot cup of tea and a fine Dutch stroop waffel.
I love this time of year!
From dictionary.com.  Only the very last one, even slightly could apply in this case, however, I have never seen anyone use the term "patented" to mean anything but the noun/adjective versions below, and in fact,

"Under current U.S. Patent law, anyone can file a lawsuit against a manufacturer that has falsely marked their product as patented with an intent to deceive the public."    https://ocpatentlawyer.com/penalty-for-false-patent-marking/


The use here is clearly misleading.


noun: patent
  • the exclusive right granted by a government to an inventor to manufacture, use, or sell an invention for a certain number of years.
  • an invention or process protected by this right.

adjective pa·tent
  • protected by a patent; patented:
  • pertaining to, concerned with, or dealing with patents, especially on inventions
verb
  • to take out a patent on; obtain the exclusive rights to (an invention, process, etc.) by a patent.
  • to originate and establish as one's own.


thecarpathian766 posts11-29-2019 2:30pmatdavid, Wow. I am really, REALLY starting to question your comprehension skills. If you would re-read the meaning of the 'adjective patented' as opposed to the meaning of the 'noun patented' it makes your point meaningless. I guess it was a little too hard for you after all....