How Science Got Sound Wrong


I don't believe I've posted this before or if it has been posted before but I found it quite interesting despite its technical aspect. I didn't post this for a digital vs analog discussion. We've beat that horse to death several times. I play 90% vinyl. But I still can enjoy my CD's.  

https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil...
128x128artemus_5
the human hearing system was designed, from the ground up, over millennia, in the realm of natural selection, to hear through and past noise and wow & flutter. It was designed to do these complex things via it’s temporally sensitive and aligned comb filter ’multi thousand point’ amplitude triggered system. All tied to the most complex and potent bit of computing power known to exist ---the human mind.
And yes noise can impact our hearing perception both negative and positive. There is more than just simple amplitude triggering predator/prey hearing. Communication and language processing has resulted in significant processing capabilities w.r.t. tone and pace where "wow and flutter" can have meaning, hence we detect this unnatural artifact.


Hence my nicely rude line about how people wear their consciousness. (where I do not exempt myself, and.. as this post comes into focus for the reader...it is seen as frighteningly close to the truth)
Rude? perhaps. A straw-man and call to authority more obviously. It seems most definite that did nothing to move the argument forward.


Something about time, and cognition, If I recall correctly....
No, something about trying to take the complex interpretation of sound that occurs in humans and equate that, without evidence, to a level of "information lost" in an electrical signal, to make a claim about digital systems (or even electrical signals), that cannot be supported by any accepted methods of measurement.
the human hearing system was designed, from the ground up, over millennia...
Something is wrong with this sentence.
Well, for one thing it’s a giant logical fallacy, I’m just not sure which one. It’s possible it’s the sky is blue logical fallacy. Or is it the we are all robots fallacy? Difficult to say. It might also be the I know everything but you don’t understand fallacy.
@geoffkait , oh, I got 'over it' quite awhile ago.  Overanalysis of all of it begat no real answers after all.

One can consider/debate/argue/laugh/whine/freakout/love it/leave it all until your head begins to hurt.  Or run out of breath or excuses.  'Go Zen', go crazy, fall into apathy, fall out, fall in...or just fall.

It doesn't change a thing....It just Is.  Live it or live with it.

Acceptance....as you inferred. ;)  Cheers...*G*
Post removed