No, it is like saying that someone who saw something in a scene a year ago, then saw the same scene today and claimed they noticed some minor change, has less credibility than someone who is comparing two pictures. Sort of like how people with "photographic" memory will regularly "remember" something in the scene they just saw that was not there.
That's like saying an actual witness to an event has no more credibility than one who hasn't. It's a word game now, and has been for a great while.