Tend to disagree with some on the SMEs. I've owned the IV and the V and found them to be excellent. They exude a quality and precision that makes them a joy to set up and use, and I had great experiences with many cartridges on them over the years. Best in the world? I am not sure there is anything in audio that I would claim emphatically so, but they are undoubtedly great performers. To each their own.
SME is leaving the OEM and aftermarket/retail tonearm business.
I was an SME dealer for quite awhile. Loved their arms, but alas, they are going to only be available on their own tables:
https://www.analogplanet.com/content/sme-exits-oem-and-retail-tone-arm-business
https://www.analogplanet.com/content/sme-exits-oem-and-retail-tone-arm-business
- ...
- 20 posts total
Audiotroy, no they are not. It depends on the cartridge. But I do myself prefer the 4 points. I have a 9 and a 14. The SME 5 would be wonderful for high compliance cartridges but there are not many of those left. So for most of the cartridges we like today you are right. I like the Triplanar but do not like unipivots. The Graham is the best unipivot available because of its magnetic stabilization and build quality but I think the 4 point 9 is a better arm at a fraction of the price. If you have a Koetsu or an Air Tight the 4 point 14 is an arm you have to hear. |
oscar44 Tend to disagree with some on the SMEs. I've owned the IV and the V and found them to be excellent. They exude a quality and precision that makes them a joy to set up and use, and I had great experiences with many cartridges on them over the years.Same here. I've used an SME V for years and it's the best pick-up arm I've ever had. In my system it replaced a Fidelity Research FR-64FX, which is also an excellent arm. But I think the SME is better, and it is also more versatile. |
- 20 posts total