Has to be said
But I do want to know whether GK or atdavid are correct in their understanding of the above discussion. Only because GK uses his knowledge of things unknown to a number of us as a sword to disembowel anyone who disagrees with him. And I kind of wonder if he knows what he is talking about or not. He is so clueless not even Alicia Silverstone could do him justice. Peter Sellers. Maybe. |
| Post removed |
jetter, GK uses his knowledge of things unknown to a number of us as a sword to disembowel anyone who disagrees with him. And I kind of wonder if he knows what he is talking about or not. In all seriousness, he does every once in a while post something that makes me wonder. Like, he sure seems to understand the details of CD pit and land and how CD is really an analog medium. There might even be a couple more like this where he gets something right. Out of 18,000.... Year or so ago when I first started coming here Forest for the Trees took me to task over the word, electromagnetic. Notice now its okay to say electromagnetic. Never fear, it will probably return to being sophomoric again now that I've mentioned it. Forest for the Trees has a whole website devoted to his alternate universe. A world of Morphic Fields ruled by the Nimbus Sub Hertz Platform, the Firestone 16-wheeler air bag, springs, and rocks. I worry you think I might be kidding. http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina24.htm http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina43.htm Yes teleportation. For only several hundred dollars he will call you on the phone and wherever you are in the world you will hear your system improve all thanks to his telepathic use of pebbles, er I mean W.C. er I mean Morphic Fields. Forest for the Trees occasionally makes the mistake of trying to disembowel me. What looks like a sword to you looks like word salad to me. If there were any sense to be made of it I would let you know. Like the CD thing. He got that right. Give the man credit. Anything else? Let you know when I find it. Don't hold your breath. Forest for the Trees loves to quote physicist Feynman. But notice its always the quote meant to put you in your place. If I could explain it to you it wouldn't be worth the Nobel Prize. Uses that one so much he has it all ready to cut and paste. At least I figure that has to be it. Because when I cut and paste *his version* into a browser all that comes up are his posts. Its never what Feynman actually said, which is worded a bit differently. More to the point, its contrary to another thing Feynman said, that if you really understand then you can explain it to anyone. Feynman's famous for being able to explain the most complicated puzzles in a way that just about anyone can understand. That's the difference between knowing, and memorizing. He's memorized, that's for sure. But what does he really know? |
Sometimes he is right, and sometimes wrong. You know when he is wrong when he fights the hardest and deflects the most, like now. Google search photon energy. Easily done. The equation I posted E = h*f is readily known, easily understood, and not disputed. Light has a much higher f (frequency) versus the long radio waves used for submarine communication versus the very long wavelengths of Schmuman resonances. Therefore the laser light photons are the most energetic by far. So in that instance GK was completely wrong. Similarly, the fact that a CD player is a "cavity" where laser light bounces around has nothing to do with Schuman resonances. The CD player "cavity" is but a box with reflections. It could be any size. The speed of light is meaningless in the discussion. Schuman resonance frequency is very specific due to the diameter of the Earth and height of the ionosphere and the speed of light. That defines the frequency. To say the two are the same .... is wrong. To say that Schuman resonances are photons is correct. That is simply wave/particle duality from quantum mechanics and they are waves and particles, i.e. photons. To say it is a "field" is not correct, though an oscillating field is induced as it moves. All these things are easily researched.
|
