Has to be said


Hi,
i been reading most sites and the little arguments about this and that about making audio in this case be more pleasent ot better to any individual. and have to say upfront that if "you" believe its better to you than it is in fact true to you and you only. we are just reletive respondants to each other and therefore nature and the universe.
many of the subjects that come up as to improving ones audio system tend to go into little details that may or may not have "real" affects on most of us. and also be provable with phsics,math,medical studies etc.many musicians and many humans can distinguish alot of these aspects. and they are ALL quantifiable and measureable very easilly. from 1800 till today FFT and resonance,sound perfiliration has been well adjustable from the totally acoustic pipe organs to the music halls 100s of years ago with out electronic fixes, and all these new snake oil gagets on the market. many are always big commenters here on this site.
Its totally true you can "fix" and sound wave with free rocks,walls,chambers, etc. so go for it at a cost of zero dollars. and adbandon all these marketing hacks.
Ive been well into sound,RF,Radioation, Electron manulipation, Audio,phsics etc all my life and all my relatives aslso . I dont need to justify my opinions yet am dignified by holding 8 international patents,2 doctrets and my dad with similar fields.
one crazy obvious thing no one even bothers to mention is the way off standard of 440hz shifted 8hz the earths standard resonance. while all the 1000s of years 432hz was based on real natural happenings before electronics. dont you all care everything you listen to is 8hz off tune and therefore wrong, but you will bicker about a few microvolts noise from an ocslittating wire with parallell wire  hanging off a standoff. itf too funny to me.
yes all digital except one source tunes their DAC math to 435hz to be more correct to Verdi and other great composers.
ive got tuning forks over the audio and above spectrum and tune my panios violins etc to them 432 hz
and need to say again. yes please do everything Analoge
to correct your sound system, its been done in churches,music halls,the great pyrmids, with instruments themselves.
but do not chase the rabbit down the money hole to fix apparent physhoacoustics in your listening area.

ps the spelling and writing is horrid cause ive got a brain injury2 years ago and under go EEG,ehthesographs and neuro studies constantly. where various frequency sweeps are put thru me and studied by the medical and commercial fields.
Im off for now to play my bass thru 50000watts total. and resonate the neighborhood at 8.2 HZ....

128x128hemigreg
Oh, OK. Have it your way. Here’s the first chocolate bonbon 💩 you deposited in my in-basket.

“ive been with MIT, THe govt,the r russians,and most pubically published places. yet with,fbi cia natiomal security etc.
and will not tollerate you your jabs at hnational security at all.
thats why im silent in this mail. you can post as will as free speech but at some pointmay post a risk. esp with counter measures as thety are xcalled from jamming takl.
please feel free to convey your message as well as your true identity in public as i have..
unless the dig will begin to your true ISP address .”


atdavid
Be good GK, or I will have to take marks off for bad behaviour. Ever notice that X-ray telescopes are only at very high altitudes or space based, but you can get pretty good visible light resolution at ground level. Turns out much visible light passes almost unhindered through the atmosphere, but X-rays are blocked, even though higher energy ..... hmm...

>>>>Did you ever notice that the CD laser isn’t really red? It’s infrared, 780 nm. It only looks red 🚨 as a safety precaution. (You know audiophiles!). That’s why a considerable amount, let’s say 25%, of the scattered laser light that gets into the detector is visible red. Which is why the Green Pen around the outer edge is audible. Agree? Disagree? Talk amongst yourselves.
No discussion needed. You are publishing false information (noted many times) to shill for your products. Please stop!
Actually, you can think of electrons, protons, etc, as schisms in dimensional pairings. and that the thing you call 3-d time-space is a angular (or offset) resonance zone that is ..er..partially a result of that dimensional schism pairing.

Where all you know, and exist as... in your objective unidirectional 3-d time-space "reality"...is just a phase coupled resonance zone due to a dimensional schism pairing.

Try that on as a theoretical exercise and a lot of the problems that are outstanding, tend to look like...... they might be capable of being cleared up.

It will take some careful unpacking but one might find quite a lot hiding inside that proposal.