mahgister,
The timing resolution, within the bandwidth limited system, is orders of magnitude better than the sampling rate at even fairly low SNR. Within a bandwidth limited system, which the "mechanical" auditory system starts as, continuous time can be represented, effectively perfect, by sampled data points. It really is the same under those limits of bandwidth and there is absolutely nothing to indicate our acoustic perception is not bandwidth limited.
There have been experiments done on temporal resolution w.r.t. bandwidth of the signal. At some point, increasing bandwidth stops increasing temporal resolution, and that stop point is within the limits of the audio bandwidth as commonly discussed.
Unfortunately, the author seemed to be writing from a position of "feelings" as opposed to well researched science. There is research, math, even well accepted scientific knowledge that directly refutes his position.
The timing resolution, within the bandwidth limited system, is orders of magnitude better than the sampling rate at even fairly low SNR. Within a bandwidth limited system, which the "mechanical" auditory system starts as, continuous time can be represented, effectively perfect, by sampled data points. It really is the same under those limits of bandwidth and there is absolutely nothing to indicate our acoustic perception is not bandwidth limited.
There have been experiments done on temporal resolution w.r.t. bandwidth of the signal. At some point, increasing bandwidth stops increasing temporal resolution, and that stop point is within the limits of the audio bandwidth as commonly discussed.
Unfortunately, the author seemed to be writing from a position of "feelings" as opposed to well researched science. There is research, math, even well accepted scientific knowledge that directly refutes his position.