Go Active Crossover or Upgrade existing XOs?



It was recently suggested to me that rather than doing a crossover upgrade 

I look into an active crossover for my Tannoy FSMs. Anyone experienced enough 

to guide me? What advantages does active provide?


gadios
The Bryston room at RMAF was bi-amped active external crossover as
well. System sounded great.


I had forgotten about the Levinson HQD system: Hartley, Quad, Dahlquist.  Amazing system, you have to have the dedicated space for it though, it was rather large to say the least.


Digital cross-overs are unlimited, though stock cross-overs and firmware only touch on what is possible with advanced signal processing which can do things that no analog cross-over, active or passive could ever do, especially integrated in design with a purpose built amplifier.
Surely they have no side-affects?
With a digital input, only the side effects you intend, which any speaker is going to greatly swamp.
atdavid
With a digital input, only the side effects you intend, which any speaker is going to greatly swamp
There is no crossover that is perfect, not even an active digital crossover. Although speaker systems almost always have distortion many, many times greater than a quality audio component, that does not mean that the speaker system will not reveal faults in those components. What you wrote is a bit ambiguous, so perhaps that’s not what you intended to say.
With a digital input, only the side effects you intend, which any speaker is going to greatly swamp.
Hey, can I go with "DSP" and live happily ever after?