Cube Audio or Charney

Thanks @jdal  for you comments,  i began my speaker disign life with single driver crossoverless loudspeakers , it looks very attractive to speaker guys, no need to design crossover , just get very good driver, make good cabinet , probably some back loaded horn, get screwdriver
install the driver and you are winner,  If you have good account you can participate in Audio Shows and go to the Market.  Sounds good, If not enough base - make good sub and offer package deal, But what is problem ? Why the majority speaker company still making traditional 2-3-4 way speakers with " Stupid Crossovers"  , The main issues is high sensitivity crossover less design speakers-- are thin sound ( not enough midbass) piano sound and man vocal is not real , 
and whizzer cone coloration, The whizzer cone working like addition tweeter and not compare with high end tweeters.     

Bache, can we agree that all speakers are a compromise?  My crossoverless AER was not thin sounding at all.   I guess my question to you have you heard either the Charney or Cube audio in a room  you know and with familiar equipment?  It has been suggested by numerous listeners that both of these speakers have eliminated the usual single driver problems.

Of course i listen all of them , but to be agree or not you have to compare
you not thin sounding speakers with traditional for example  Kef or any one using speaker selector switch
Best

Thanks Bache.  I am 67 and over the past 40 - 45 years have heard every type of speaker imaginable.  I have also owned multi way box speakers, electrostatic, single driver,  open baffle, ect.  My current speaker is a great 2 way in a 1/2" granite cabinet.  I have enjoyed all the different types of speakers I have owned but my curiosity has me looking at these two speakers.  Btw your speakers look fantastic.  I am sure they are great performers.

 Ok   you little bit older (2years) ,   my suggestion--
 all 2 get fantastic sound