Uh, memory of water idea has not been proven but it’s pretty to think so. I.e., it’s purported to be true. Wink wink 😉
How Science Got Sound Wrong
I don't believe I've posted this before or if it has been posted before but I found it quite interesting despite its technical aspect. I didn't post this for a digital vs analog discussion. We've beat that horse to death several times. I play 90% vinyl. But I still can enjoy my CD's.
https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil...
https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil...
- ...
- 397 posts total
geoffkaitYou are right in the collective sense of an accepted scientific truth...But way more than Emoto, the French Nobel Winner has years of works that proves it and he succeed to legitimate the great Jacques Benveniste whose research first 20 years ago has proved also " the water memory"... This expression originates with Benveniste, whose reputation was destroyed in the process of proof...Montagner wanted to rehabilitate him by proving that he was right in the first place …"Nature" and John Maddox wanted to debunk his research ( implicating even James Randi) because their view of the world or science was contradicted by these waters memory and in the process kills the scientist reputation and life...A sad but revelatory story... It will be more difficult to kill Luc Montagner... |
I guess people believe what they want to believe. I don’t know that much about memory of water but it seems a little far-fetched to me. And I am the Grand Wazoo of far-fetched. Be that as it may if people wish to believe in the memory of water I hold no ill will. I might consider looking more closely at memory of water if it could somehow be used to improve the sound. What is it good for? I certainly don’t know. Even Nobelists can have their own little pet theories. It kind of comes with the territory. |
- 397 posts total