What is your experience with legacy CH Acoustic cables?

My first experience w/ CH Acoustic cables (September):

Sources: 
EVS Modded Oppo 105
Rega RP8 w/ Dynavector Karat D3

Amp:
Decware SE34I.5 w/ UFO mods & 25th anniversary mods

Cables:
Marigo Audio Labs, Omega Mikro, & Analysis Plus Inc.

Immediate takeaways of X10 loom:
The already low noise floor dropped, creating an almost eerily quiet backdrop for the music.  Subtle sounds and nuances became apparent against this backdrop. The music flowed and became smoother and more emotionally engaging.  I didn't realize how much music was escaping through my prior cable loom.

My second experience w/ CH Acoustic cables (October):

After exploring this hobby for well over two decades, I've become cautious about exciting new sounds and experiences.  I try to calm/test my own responses to ensure they're meaningful and lasting.  So...

I decided to keep the X10 Power Cables & X10 Interconnects, but let the speaker cables go back to CH Acoustic.  Did the magic leave entirely? No. 

Gradually...I had to acknowledge that music passages, where dynamics and complexity led to a immersive experience...were lost w/o the speaker cables.  Indeed, at the very end of the system, the special magic (that led to greater emotional engagement) had escaped though my old speaker cables.

Solution, I contacted CH Acoustic & purchased the X10 speaker cables.  Full loom equals full magic.  I'm an audiophile.  I have to have it.    

I never heard of CH Acoustic so googled it and read a Positive Feedback review about them.The review reminded me so much of auditioning an ic from Audio Sensibility(Statement se, OCC silver).Really beautiful,detailed,but too soft for my taste.My preference is a more 'live' sound.The review mirrored my thoughts anyway.Now I'm wondering if a whole loom is necessary to get an accurate impression of a cable manufacture's signature sound?I've tried that in the past a few times but it only worked well once.Sounds like you hit the jackpot with your CH loom,so congrats!Hopefully more owners will chime in:-)Enjoy!

Thanks so much for your post.  Yes, I am becoming convinced the full loom is the only way to obtain an accurate impression of a cable manufacturer's sound.  

Just today, a friend and I were discussing why?...My current belief is the consistency of design.  If the design has flaws, the flaws will be exposed and heard, establishing the loom's "sound" & "character".   In this line of thinking, lesser flaws, lesser character, & more music!  :)

In addition, I finally enjoyed a more demonstrably obvious A/B comparison with the full loom.  In the past, I felt I was auditioning "tone controls" as I mixed & matched various manufacturers (and their various design flaws) for my system's cable loom.  The result was frustration and boredom.  It just wasn't compelling.  

Anyway, thanks again for your post & hopefully we'll hear from others...

My third experience w/ CH Acoustic cables (October):

Maybe you're not as decadent as I, but I've owned four different pairs of speakers for most of the 2019.  I like all four pairs.  However, in direct A/B or A/B/C/D comparisons, I kept coming away without a clear winner.  My solution..wait.  

Move forward...w/ the X10 loom...why not try again with A/B/C/D comparisons?

1.  All speakers sounded better: Takeaway - the X10 loom removed a constraint from the system...letting all four speaker pairs shine.

2.  All speakers had a more defined character:  Takeaway - w/o some (???) former loom constraints, the design flaws of each speaker pair...were more greatly exposed and obvious, establishing the speakers' sound & character.   

3.  It was so EASY to discern the speaker pair that I believed provided greater performance.  No need to do 39 consecutive A/B comparisons.  No need to tabulate my thoughts.  No headaches.  No need to call in friends and family for evaluation opinions....By the way, I've warn out this option with my wife.  :)

So...maybe you're not as decadent as I, but I enjoyed this section of audiophile roller coaster.  As an audiophile...maybe that's okay.  ;)