What is your experience with legacy CH Acoustic cables?

My third experience w/ CH Acoustic cables (October):

Maybe you're not as decadent as I, but I've owned four different pairs of speakers for most of the 2019.  I like all four pairs.  However, in direct A/B or A/B/C/D comparisons, I kept coming away without a clear winner.  My solution..wait.  

Move forward...w/ the X10 loom...why not try again with A/B/C/D comparisons?

1.  All speakers sounded better: Takeaway - the X10 loom removed a constraint from the system...letting all four speaker pairs shine.

2.  All speakers had a more defined character:  Takeaway - w/o some (???) former loom constraints, the design flaws of each speaker pair...were more greatly exposed and obvious, establishing the speakers' sound & character.   

3.  It was so EASY to discern the speaker pair that I believed provided greater performance.  No need to do 39 consecutive A/B comparisons.  No need to tabulate my thoughts.  No headaches.  No need to call in friends and family for evaluation opinions....By the way, I've warn out this option with my wife.  :)

So...maybe you're not as decadent as I, but I enjoyed this section of audiophile roller coaster.  As an audiophile...maybe that's okay.  ;)

My fourth experience w/ CH Acoustic cables (October):

Now that I was having fun making system comparisons and remember...I'm a decadent audiophile...  :) ... I decided to test my trusted Decware amp vs. a Balanced Audio Technology VK6200.  

Exactly as occurred w/ the speaker A/B/C/D comparison, both amps sounded wonderful.  However, w/ the BAT, the sound-stage expanded and the impact expanded.  

Did the Decware lose...No...just a different way to obtain beautiful sound.  I kept them both!  

I agree that a really good pair of speaker cables will show exactly what an amp and speakers are capable of.Plus that will let you hear what is good and bad upstream so you can evaluate and address any issues.

 An additional thought I would offer beyond jtcf's post, the full loom of a cable manufacturer or model can provide a more consistent foundation to display the capability the system (i.e. amp, pre-amp, speakers, & source).  I'm also assuming that the cable manufacturer truly develops synergistic cables that are more than the sum of the parts.

My fifth experience w/ CH Acoustic cables (November):

As an audiophile, I let my ears be my guide.  Admittedly, I made this choice out of necessity.  I've found the science too difficult to decipher in this hobby.  In addition, I've found it difficult to find a solid source for science.  I want to be discerning, but there's so much MISINFORMATION and so many GLOWING reviews.  It's just tough...

Anyway, a good friend has attempted to convince me that the science of balanced vs. single ended connections (balanced as superior) is sound and undeniable.  In the past, I stuck with single ended because it worked, the stars didn't need to align, & it was one less variable in the pursuit of great sound.  

Well, after my October experiments, I had access to a balanced source, a balanced amp, & a great cable loom.  I decided now was the time to compare balanced vs. single ended connections.  

So.......it was an easy win for balanced connections.  The noise floor dropped, the outlines of sounds became easier to identify and locate, and more subtleties of music appeared. No negatives, only positives.

Some of you aren't surprised.  I was.  Believe it or not, I tried this experiment a few years ago with a different loom and heard no discernible improvement.  On reflection, I don't believe my system was fully balanced at the time, so maybe the stars weren't properly aligned to take advantage of the science.???