@kenjit said:
Agreed. It's not free, it a choice. Free will......
You've now displayed "victimhood" on both the manufacturers and consumers sides of speaker purchase deals. Typical victim mentality.
I can play this game all day. Feel free to keep up your petty replies and I'll keep coming back with free market principles...
Kenjit, It is part of Zu's business model and they have accounted for the costs of potential returns. It's the way Zu has choosen to do business. I'm sure they have determined that it is an effective use of "marketing budget", and much less expensive than advertising in the traditional sense. Also, it is called "free will". Zu knowingly operates this way, knowing a certain percentage of speakers will be returned. It's their choice to accept returns and it is the consumers choice to return if not satisfied. It is a win/win.
Reading some of your previous posts, you almost always say the speaker companies are cheating or duping the consumer. In this case, the "evil speaker manufacturer" is offering an OUT in the event the consumer does not find the speaker to be a good value.
Why do you have an issue with this?
its not free for the company. They end up paying for it
Agreed. It's not free, it a choice. Free will......
You've now displayed "victimhood" on both the manufacturers and consumers sides of speaker purchase deals. Typical victim mentality.
I can play this game all day. Feel free to keep up your petty replies and I'll keep coming back with free market principles...
Kenjit, It is part of Zu's business model and they have accounted for the costs of potential returns. It's the way Zu has choosen to do business. I'm sure they have determined that it is an effective use of "marketing budget", and much less expensive than advertising in the traditional sense. Also, it is called "free will". Zu knowingly operates this way, knowing a certain percentage of speakers will be returned. It's their choice to accept returns and it is the consumers choice to return if not satisfied. It is a win/win.
Reading some of your previous posts, you almost always say the speaker companies are cheating or duping the consumer. In this case, the "evil speaker manufacturer" is offering an OUT in the event the consumer does not find the speaker to be a good value.
Why do you have an issue with this?